Jump to content

What are your top 3 films/types for scanning?


meatboy

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello all,

 

I'd be keen to hear you opinions as to what are your top three scanning films, one film type in each catagory of Slide / Negative / BW and what scanner you use? These are the films you feel you have had the best results from and work well in your scanning process.

 

Scanner -

Slide -

Negative -

BW -

 

Add any notes or comments or not as you see fit.

 

Thanks

 

Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

x
Guest maddin

Scanner - Konica Minolta DiMAGE Scan Elite 5400 II (wish it could work from roll - once it breaks I see myself using a Nikon. Otherwise wonderful performance.)

 

Slide - none

 

Negative - Portra VC & NC for their colour respectively tones

 

BW - BW400CN (scanned as colour neg to get Digital ICE working). Adjusting levels and contrast upon need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really spend any time experimenting and don't know much about the technical side of these choices. They're just what I've always used and never saw much need to change. Color transparency scanning with the Nikon and Provia works pretty well with fairly quick and painless color correction.

 

Scanner - Nikon 9000ED (film), Epson V700 (flatbed)

Slide - Provia 100 & 400

Negative - Portra NC (though don't shoot color neg anymore)

BW - Tri-X 400, Neopan 1600 & 100

Link to post
Share on other sites

For small format, I use mostly Minolta DES 5400 I, for middle format Nikon Coolscan 9000, both with Silverfast. Coolscan 9000 produces very good scans from small format, but the Minolta is visibly better (in terms of sharpness and resolution). Pity that Minolta's gone.

 

Slide: Fuji Velvia 100 works very well, especially with IT8-calibration (but most other transparency films, too)

Negs: Fuji Superia Reala 100, with almost no problems. Kodak Portra is not easy to handle, but can give excellent results if post-processed patiently

b/w: Delta 100 and 400. Fuji Acros is quite good, but a little bit hard (in Silverfast the film works well with the profile for Delta 100).

 

Yours,

Greg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Delta 100, Fuji Acros and Efke 25 in that order. I've only got two rolls of Efke left - not sure if it is available any more. In my experience, anything over 400 ISO scans poorly with my Minolta 5400. also, Velvia scans great but I don't shoot it that often, especially since my M8 got here:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scanner - Epson V750 flatbed

 

Slide - don't use, used to shoot Ektachrome but haven't tried scanning it

 

Colour negative - Kodak Portra 160 nc (superb results)

 

B/W negative - Kodak T-Max 400 or Ilford HP5. Curiously, HP5 seems to scan better than FP4 - can't think why.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it is worth, I have been trying to expose bw400iso at 200 and the negs look pretty crisp. Minolta 5400ii is having a tough time getting through them.

 

Pulling silver based films seems only for the enlarger, too tough for scans. Anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems that pull processing leaves a neg a little bit too meaty and maybe with too little contrast to scan as well as 100iso @ 100, or 400iso @ 400. I can get a scan and work it up ok for web, but doesnt like to print very well. Still working on it. Using the Minolta program, probably need to fork out for something else, like silverfast or vuescan. Get the feeling better to push than pull with silver based, but will try to wet process some next week for comparison.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...