Jump to content

No fringing with 15mm Heliar


elmar3

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I find no fringing with the 15mm Heliar with the M9 software version 1.176. I manually selected the lens and used the 16mm option for the 16-18-21 ASPH. Great lens, super sharp and very usable on the M9 without having to worry about correcting the supposed red fringing in the frame corners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At Lens Detection - Auto - my M9P (ver.1.196) detects 21 f.2.8 ASPH as primary lens.

But my new 15 Heliar M is certainly best at manually selected 21 f.2.8 (11134).

Try the lens indoors in a low light situation and you will see the difference in all settings, at least I do...

 

Best Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try the 21 mm selection and compare results.

Do not use the 21 mm WATE setting! First, that's no different from the 16 mm WATE setting, and second, it's a bad choice for a prime superwide anyway (because the WATE's internal design is very different from any other super-wide-angle lens).

 

Better try using the settings for the Elmarit-M 21 mm and the Elmarit-M 21 mm Asph.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Welcome to the forum, VisualLifeLine!

 

With quite a question. 15mm can be pretty wide/ too wide sometimes for landscapes,

but of course, it is a very intersting option in the hands of good photographer.

 

Even 21mm will be too wide very often.

 

If I would have to decide between the two, it would be the 21mm-thing

 

But you should do some experiments before, about what comes close to your

favourite angles of view. Don´t forget to check the 90- and 135mm-option for

landscapes. These can do much more for an attractive landscapeshot than

superwides.

 

 

best

GEORG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum, VisualLifeLine!

 

With quite a question. 15mm can be pretty wide/ too wide sometimes for landscapes,

but of course, it is a very intersting option in the hands of good photographer.

 

Even 21mm will be too wide very often.

 

If I would have to decide between the two, it would be the 21mm-thing

 

But you should do some experiments before, about what comes close to your

favourite angles of view. Don´t forget to check the 90- and 135mm-option for

landscapes. These can do much more for an attractive landscapeshot than

superwides.

 

 

best

GEORG

 

Thanks for your answer. I owned a Zeiss Distagon 21 2.8 and sold it to finance a M9. I was actaully very happy with this focal length for my needs. I just thought maybe the15mm Heliar is a cheaper option, but it doesn't seem so....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...