cmarbach Posted March 19, 2007 Share #21  Posted March 19, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) These are both with 1.092, one with and one without the IR filter. Summicron f2.0 35mm. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/19143-ir-magenta-and-1092-without-filter/?do=findComment&comment=205821'>More sharing options...
Jamie Roberts Posted March 19, 2007 Share #22 Â Posted March 19, 2007 Carl, Â FWIW, I noticed the difference under tungsten light. Also FWIW, we didn't say it was gone, just that it was better--and more manageable if you shoot JPEGs in post. Â How were those taken, out of interest? JPEG or RAW? If RAW, how processed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmarbach Posted March 19, 2007 Share #23 Â Posted March 19, 2007 They were taken Raw+ Jpeg, but these were the Jpegs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.