blakley Posted March 14, 2007 Share #21 Â Posted March 14, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) It always entertains me that we endorse the manipulations performed before the shutter button is pressed (selection of focal length, depth of field, exposure, filtration, location of camera, etc...) but denounce those performed after the shutter button is pressed (dodging, burning, cropping, color manipulation, cloning, etc...) Â My father did me a big favor when I was very young: he told me that the camera always lies, and then showed me how newspaper photographers told their visual lies. Â The camera tells a story - not the truth. If you want the colors that were in the scene - BE THERE. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 14, 2007 Posted March 14, 2007 Hi blakley, Take a look here How much alteration is allowed ?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
carstenw Posted March 14, 2007 Share #22 Â Posted March 14, 2007 Ansel Adams was an incredible photographer, but there is a big difference between dodging and burning and alot of the post work that was described. Â I can tell by the comments many people disagree, I believe it was cartier bresson who described photography as an instant painting. Â Do as you wish, but I do not believe the first lieca was invented with the use of photoshop in mind. Â Have you seen before and after shots from Ansel Adams? Some of his most famous shots looked nothing like the real scene. Dodging, burning, development techniques, paper choice, film choice, there are a lot of choices available. Â Maybe I missed something, but I thought in this thread we were basically talking about raw converters, not Photoshop with fancy filters. I agree that it is fine for a magazine to restrict those kinds of effects, if they so desire. However, even fancy effects with Photoshop are very much part of the workflow of some pros, and this has nothing to do with being a bad photographer. It all depends on what you want. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erl Posted March 14, 2007 Share #23 Â Posted March 14, 2007 I think that these discussed techniques are correctly known as 'creativity' as opposed to 'recording', which the camera only does fairly poorly. Â When ever someone remarks to me"Oh, the camera never lies", I respond with "the camera is the greatest liar on earth, save, perhaps, for me". Â I am in total agreement with a previous poster's father and his observation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted March 14, 2007 Share #24 Â Posted March 14, 2007 If you're a photo-journalist adding or removing an element to a photograph can be seen as deceitful. For everyone else it's no big deal, even if it's something I tend not to do - oddly I feel less guilty about removing than adding. Â Have to go, there's a kangaroo I need to add to my snap of the last supper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted March 14, 2007 Share #25 Â Posted March 14, 2007 .. got one in me backyard, it's free for a couple of weeks anyway the hound is sick of chasing the giant bush rat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted March 14, 2007 Share #26 Â Posted March 14, 2007 I always wondered where Noah got his kangaroos from. Did they have Fed-Ex in those days? Â Not to mention why did he take those two bloody mosquitos??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted March 14, 2007 Share #27 Â Posted March 14, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) .. the clone tool... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.