Keith (M) Posted August 5, 2012 Share #1 Posted August 5, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) Just lately I have switched developer from Ilfosol 3 to Paterson's Aculux 3 and have so far been pleased with the results. To date have only processed three films - one each of HP5+, Tri-X and Acros 100. Examples from the latter two are below. Anyone else using Aculux 3? Neopan Acros 100 @ ISO 80 (1+9 for 7.5 minutes) Tri-X @ ISO 320 (1+9 for 11.5 minutes) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 5, 2012 Posted August 5, 2012 Hi Keith (M), Take a look here Aculux 3 Developer. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
archi4 Posted August 5, 2012 Share #2 Posted August 5, 2012 I did use it until I dimantled my darkroom and found it to be a very fine developer. As is clearly shown by your examples where your skill in seing and capturing is perfectly supported by the technical process. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted August 5, 2012 Share #3 Posted August 5, 2012 I use Paterson developers for my Pan F+ and they are well suited Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.