Jump to content

X2 with OLY VF2 Yes it works, here is the proof


satijntje

Recommended Posts

x
  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The Olympus EVF also comes in silver:

 

Olympus EP-9 Eye cup for the Electronic Viewfinder (VF-2) - Only £17.99 - SRS Microsystems

 

 

And there's an eye cup

 

Olympus EP-9 Eyecup for VF-2 Viewfinder 260544 B&H Photo Video

 

Scroll down below the eye cup info to see the silver EVF.

 

I wonder which will look better with the silver X2... the black or silver EVF.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was wondering the same thing whether the black EVF or the Silver...

What about just getting the OVF instead of the EVF? What are the advantages of that vs the EVF? Can any one advise please?

 

Thank you in advance

 

The bright-line OVF can only give you a close approximation of what your framing is going to be, as there is absolutely no connection between it and the sensor and therefore you have no settings information displayed. There is no focus point indicator or parallax correction. The EVF on the other hand shows you exactly the same information that you would see through the lens on the back LCD. It is input directly from the sensor. The OVF is not without its merits, however. It is bright, clear, does not use any battery power and there is no image lag. With a bit of practice and using the technique of focus-recompose, one can get to be pretty accurate in auto-focusing the camera on what one wants, using the OVF. It is also smaller and considerably cheaper than the new Leica branded Olympus EVF (at double the cost of the original).

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your linked article:

 

"Instead, Leica chose the Olympus VF-2, which - as the Leica EVF 2 - is almost identical apart from the Leica brand and shaping of the front of the device."

 

Leica version

 

Leica X2 EVF-2 Electronic Viso-Flex Viewfinder 18753 - 18753 - Harrison Cameras Direct

 

Olympus version

 

Olympus VF-2 Electronic Viewfinder (Black) 260057 B&H Photo

 

They are not identical, but they might be considered to be non-identical twins.

Link to post
Share on other sites

which vf would be better for street photography and why? sorry for all the questions....

 

Moonshine, the benefits of a separate viewfinder are well documented. They are particularly useful in bright sunlight and for accurate framing. They also help you to hold the camera steady - it is against your face instead of floating at the end of your arms. An OVF has the added advantages of consuming no power, and of being no more than a "window" - no electronics between you and your subject. I also prefer an OVF in low light because it does not attract attention or destroy my night vision.

 

For "street" use I would personally go for an OVF over an EVF because I would expect to be pre-focussing and setting exposure manually; the only reason I would need a VF is to compose my image.

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

which vf would be better for street photography and why? sorry for all the questions....

 

An interesting question! On the X1 we only had the OVF option. There, the OVF worked very well particularly since the AF of the X1 was so slow. What that meant is that for street photography it was best to use manual zone focusing. For that purpose, the critical focus point did not so much matter and the OVF was great for quick framing.

For the X2, however, since the AF is supposed to be much improved, it will be possible to use the AF for rapid street photography. In that case, the EVF will have the benefit of showing all the settings information as well as the focus point. The downside of the EVF still remains the bulkiness, power drain and excessive cost. If I upgrade to the X2, I suspect that I will still retain and use my Voigtlander OVF rather than getting the EVF. With experience I know exactly where I'm focusing when in AF and the OVF is just brighter and simpler. Without the electronics of an EVF between you and the subject the OVF gets you more intimately involved in the "decisive moment".

Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^ thank you! you explained it wonderfully! i think i will get the OVF instead. Are the frame lines accurate for a precise composition?

 

For "precise" composition, no! Only a direct EVF will give you that (if the coverage is 100%). However they are certainly accurate enough for nearly all of my photography. I rarely, if ever, need to crop adjust. Since there is no automatic parallax correction with distance, you will have to judge the framing somewhat by experience. However, as we are talking about a wide-normal lens, the parallax shift is not that great and there is no real problem with parallax from about 10 feet to infinity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...