Jump to content

Contrast versus Resolution?


Lindolfi

Recommended Posts

Guest Ornello

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Leica glass lab which was closed round 1995, developed special glasses that made possible the 1.0 Noct and 75 1.4. The Leica rep showed me a 1" cube of that stuff that was a reject. It weighed like it was solid lead.

 

The european EPA later deemed lead could not be used in glass, so substitutes had to be found.

 

 

I held that same piece, I bet. They have it at the Leica school.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am replying to a specific post there. If the post I am replying to is long, I will trim it.

 

Since the post you were "referring to" was immediately above it is un-necessary. Most other people have worked that out. In any event your "response" was a non sequiteur.

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

The squashing of lead-containing glass has been the death of many legendary lenses. Another example is the fabled Canon EF 200mm f/1.8L.

 

Thorium, too, although I don't know if Leica used it.

 

What other rare earth elements or compounds have been banned for lenses in Germany, and what effect has it had on Leica lens designs?

.

Was the Summilux 75mm f/1.4 perhaps discontinued for similar reasons?

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

What other rare earth elements or compounds have been banned for lenses in Germany, and what effect has it had on Leica lens designs?

Not just in Germany; RoHS restrictions apply EU-wide. Similar restrictions are in effect in other parts of the world, see Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

 

Among the RoHS victims from other vendors are Canon’s 1200 mm lens and the Hasselblad/Fuji XPan, btw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...