tobey bilek Posted February 1, 2012 Share #1 Â Posted February 1, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) and avoid the cheap stuff. Â How Lexar Tests its Memory Cards *VIDEO* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 1, 2012 Posted February 1, 2012 Hi tobey bilek, Take a look here Why I buy Lexar cards. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Ralf Posted February 1, 2012 Share #2 Â Posted February 1, 2012 and avoid the cheap stuff. Â How Lexar Tests its Memory Cards *VIDEO* Â Thank you for the link, I use Sandisk with my M9 and with Nikon, never ever ran into any problem, I knock on wood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dickgrafixstop Posted February 1, 2012 Share #3 Â Posted February 1, 2012 Do you really think there's that much of a difference? All the cards use the chips from the same manufacturers and the assembly is automated with little room for error. I've found the biggest difference is the printing on the label and the color plastic in the casing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted February 2, 2012 Author Share #4 Â Posted February 2, 2012 Sandisk is a counterfit target, so I don`t buy them any more , but the real ones are equally as good as Lexar. Â To me buying the cheap stuff is not worth the risk considering the thousands invested in cameras and lenses. Â B&H had 16GB Lexar 133X for sale at $20 @ around Christmas. If I did sports or video, I would opt for something faster. But I do portraits, landscapes, a bit of still life, and occasional grandkids sports, so they work for me. I bought 6 and dedicate them to particular cameras. Â They had the new Lexar reader reduced to $20 too, so I got that. Raw files go in at 1 per sec which is fast enough for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.