celloHuber Posted December 2, 2011 Share #21 Posted December 2, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Great thanks all of you for your contributions. I'd still like to see a side by side comparison of say, a portrait or a couple of macro shots... ANyone else? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 2, 2011 Posted December 2, 2011 Hi celloHuber, Take a look here d lux 5 or x10 . I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
StephenPatterson Posted December 2, 2011 Share #22 Posted December 2, 2011 I can't speak to the x10, but the macro mode of the D-Lux 5 is much better than the X100. If I did not have an M9 I would want the Fuji (X100 or X10) for it's more traditional handling, but my D-Lux 5 is a perfect "Go To" camera and just does everything well, for a point and shoot. Stephen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ians Posted December 3, 2011 Share #23 Posted December 3, 2011 Hi I have both (at the moment). I find the x10 easier to handle - no two ways about it. I have the additional grip but the Dlux5 still manages to slip through my fingers on occasion. I like the OVF - much better than expected and certainly not a 'looking down a tunnel' type that I've seen on other cameras. I haven't shot with the x10 enough yet to judge on IQ but - the Dlux5 (IMHO) handles overblown highlights better. I have managed to produce a shot with the dreaded white dot syndrome (see DPReview for more on this). It's a real shame because I really like the X10 and I hope Fuji sort this out. My wife wants my Dlux5 so I'm under pressure to keep the X10 - which brings me to another dilemma - is it fair to sell a camera to your wife? lester Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjans Posted December 3, 2011 Share #24 Posted December 3, 2011 Hi I have both (at the moment). I find the x10 easier to handle - no two ways about it. I have the additional grip but the Dlux5 still manages to slip through my fingers on occasion. I like the OVF - much better than expected and certainly not a 'looking down a tunnel' type that I've seen on other cameras. I haven't shot with the x10 enough yet to judge on IQ but - the Dlux5 (IMHO) handles overblown highlights better. I have managed to produce a shot with the dreaded white dot syndrome (see DPReview for more on this). It's a real shame because I really like the X10 and I hope Fuji sort this out. My wife wants my Dlux5 so I'm under pressure to keep the X10 - which brings me to another dilemma - is it fair to sell a camera to your wife? lester I have the X10 for about two weeks. If I did not visited DPReview I think I would not have noticed the problem with the white dot syndrome. It reminds me of all the problems there were when the M8 was released; all the complaints (here) but Leica gave a solution. Suppose Fuji will also address the white dot syndrome, but it will take some time. I only got my M8 when the M8.2 was released. Still love my M8 despite the use of IR filters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sznajder Posted December 4, 2011 Share #25 Posted December 4, 2011 I have Fuji x10 about two weeks now and I also have D-lux 4 for 16 months. If you look on the body, build quality I would pick Fuji. There is nothing wrong with Leica- it is wonderful camera but I like the size of Fuji better ( I never carried my Leica in my pockets) , grip is better on Fuji, viewfinder is a plus, for me manual zoom is great addition compare to slow zoom on Leica. I prefer Fujis DOF . It is personal preference - both great cams, with a little bit better -film like pictures from Fuji. No white disks on mine so far.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.