Open Letter to Leica — 10 Ways To Improve the M9 Rangefinder

[Rick]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Alan, artifacts might be able to be removed someday in the camera, but then you would complain that the camera over processes images and doesn't leave it up to the user to apply PP correction using a computer, which would be much more versatile and effective. At this point, Leica provides less in camera processing than most cameras and it seems that Leica users, in general, prefer this approach (albeit, the inadequate horsepower of the M9 electronics are part of the reason Leica has to do it this way).

[AlanG]

Alan, artifacts might be able to be removed someday in the camera, but then you would complain that the camera over processes images and doesn't leave it up to the user to apply PP correction using a computer, which would be much more versatile and effective. At this point, Leica provides less in camera processing than most cameras and it seems that Leica users, in general, prefer this approach (albeit, the inadequate horsepower of the M9 electronics are part of the reason Leica has to do it this way).

 

I understand this argument but there already is so much processing in the camera and surely better processing will be added over time via firmware or in the actual electronics. Just as raw converters steadily improve, the chips and algorithms improve. Likewise I think all cameras will do in camera c/a, vignetting, and distortion correction in order to give the technically "best" image out of each lens. Or at least give you a choice.

 

I think from this one example that the moiré correction in C1 looks like a big improvement but would require some testing to see if it causes some other issues in some photos.

 

When Leica comes out with the M10 and all new faster electronics, with a clip on EVF, I'll be ready.

[Rick]

Alan, I know you know this, but the M8 was like CPR to Leica. It was amazing for what it did: Allowed RF users to shoot M-glass onto a digital sensor. Pretty cool and a nice little camera for 2006 (and still is nice).

 

Then came the M9 which gave Leica some real profit for a change. But, the M9 is basically 2006 technology with a FF M8 sensor (thanks Kodak) and slightly better M8 processing electronics to accommodate the bigger sensor (thanks Jenoptik). It was a life saver for Leica, but let's be real about what age of technology it uses. Again, a nice little camera and it still is. But, it uses technology that basically is as old as the M8.

 

So, I kind of ignore these threads that compare the M9 to current systems or suggest improvements that Leica should make to the M9. These things aren't germane to what Leica is now capable of doing with the M10, now that they have some bucks and a business plan that doesn't involve praying as the primary hope for the future.

 

Alan, I believe the M10 should be what you are waiting for.

[AlanG]

Alan, I believe the M10 should be what you are waiting for.

 

I think you could be right. I have the dineros ready.