StS Posted June 10, 2010 Share #1  Posted June 10, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Good evening,  having played a bit with different films recently (BW400CN, Tri-X and Tmax400), I might have found a point, why we prefer certain films over others. Grain is a common discussion point, and here the colour process based BW400CN certainly behaves differently to classic black-and-white films. However, at least with my film scanner, I could not find any dramatic difference between Tri-X and Tmax, when it comes to grain. This might be due to the fact I tend to over-expose black-and-white films slightly, if in doubt.  Having seen some Tri-X photos, which looked like taken through a light yellow filter, I took the data sheet of BW400CN, Tri-X and Tmax400 and copied the spectral sensitivity behaviour in one file.  The film having the narrowest spectral response is BW400, cutting even into blue, which should give it a slight yellow-filter effect. The classic BW films's sensitivities, however, reach deep into ultra-violet (there goes my Tri-X-yellow-filter-theory ). Quite interesting is also the lower sensitivity of Tri-X around 500nm (green), which should give less denser negatives (or darker prints) for green.  Tmax appears to have the most uniform spectral sensitivity (also the broadest range). Interestingly, it is the film I like least, especially, when taking images of people. It might have its virtues over Tri-X, when taking landscapes, though, but I haven't tried yet.  Science aside, I prefer BW400 or Tri-X over Tmax - but this is just my (not calibrated) view...  Stefan Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/123436-spectral-sensitivity-of-black-and-white-films/?do=findComment&comment=1348825'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 10, 2010 Posted June 10, 2010 Hi StS, Take a look here Spectral sensitivity of black-and-white films. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
tgray Posted June 11, 2010 Share #2 Â Posted June 11, 2010 I've found the difference in grain between Tri-X and T-Max are minimized while scanning. It is much more apparent when doing wet prints. The spectral sensitivity in my experience is different, but probably not enough to bother me. T-Max appears to be a bit less sensitive to blue which could be nice in pictures that include the sky. Â I did notice a large difference in resolution between the two films. Both in scanning and wet printing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christer Posted June 11, 2010 Share #3 Â Posted June 11, 2010 It took me quite some time to start liking TMY, but once there it is now one of the two films I use the most. It goes very well with TMAX developer, I developer I disliked ten years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
budrichard Posted June 11, 2010 Share #4 Â Posted June 11, 2010 You may want to look into the history of orthochromatic and panchromatic films if your interested in spectral sensitivity. In particular, I can reccamend C.E. Kenneth Mees, The Theory of the Photographic Process, Macmillan Co., New York, 1942. The reason that photos of early native Americans look so dark is that they were taken with ortho film and the 'red' was enhanced.-Dick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted June 11, 2010 Share #5 Â Posted June 11, 2010 Way back in my college days, the instructor in the sensitometry class (Zone System and the like) always referred to "typical Tri-X white skies" when critiquing shots. He was not a fan of that film without some kind of filtering. Â As an aside - part of the popularity of yellow filters for B&W work (and not just for skies - David Douglas Duncan shot his Viet Nam news coverage with them), is that lenses pre-1980 still often had a lot of CA, and narrowing the spectrum to the green/red range improved real sharpness by deleting the fuzzy blue fringes we still occasionally see today, as well as darkening shadows to increase the "apparent" sharpness of contrast. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted July 5, 2010 Share #6 Â Posted July 5, 2010 [...] As an aside - part of the popularity of yellow filters for B&W work (and not just for skies - David Douglas Duncan shot his Viet Nam news coverage with them), [...] Â Under the tropical canopy, a blue filter is helpful, too. (There is no sky under the canopy) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted July 5, 2010 Share #7 Â Posted July 5, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Based on his pictures in War Without Heroes, most of the jungle canopy where DDD took his pictures had been removed by Agent Orange or a succession of loud bangs and booms. Mostly big mud piles like the fire base at Khe Sanh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.