Jump to content

POLL: Mac or PC


edlbell

Recommended Posts

Guest Bernd Banken

Advertisement (gone after registration)

the first for me: Apple LISA and later until now 3x Macs under the table and 3x iBook and Power/MacBook pro for my sons and me.

 

just reading "iWoz" by S. Wosniak - great;)

 

Bernd

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 348
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Let's not forget that you can't judge anything from a self selecting sample like this - other than to say there are at least 50 Mac users :-)

 

For a proper analysis you'd have to choose say 100 people at random and ask them what they use.

 

As someone who has dipped his toes in the Mac waters with a MacBook I have to say that the difference between the two machiens isn't as great from an operational point of view as I was expecting. I can however acknowledge that the Mac is the smarter solution 'under the hood'. Actually for a long time the PC was the more reliable machine as the MacBook would often shut itself down without warning when it came out of sleep mode.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

24" iMac 2.16GHz Core 2 Duo with 2Gb RAM.

12" PowerBook G4 1.5GHz with 1Gb RAM - soon to be passed on to my wife to allow me to get a MBP in the late spring (hoping that Apple will introduce a 12" MBP as rumoured)

No Callibration

Use a PC for Autocad + MS Project however that will change to PowerCadd next year.

Regards

 

Harry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you agree Apple might perhaps deserve very very little tar compared to MS.

 

I have no desire for this to descend into a PC v Mac thread - I think these days both are suitable platforms for users.

 

But, Apple did 'borrow' certain aspects of their OS from the Xerox at Palo Alto - the use of a mouse, gui interface, WYSIWYG editing, networking, use of laser printers etc. In fact I hadn't realised that Xerox sued Apple, but the case was thrown out of court because they delayed too long before launching the suit. See...

 

Xerox PARC - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Link to post
Share on other sites

The more OS's the better:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Here's a classic mac application (a billing program I use to get paid) running in OS9, inside SheepShaver on WinXP, running in emulation (Parallels) on OSX. Oddly enough it works and is usable. No, I don't have to do it this way; this is the OS equivalent of seeing how many students can get into a VW Beetle!

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no desire for this to descend into a PC v Mac thread - I think these days both are suitable platforms for users.

 

 

Steve,

 

I definitely agree.

Both companies have contributed a lot to the level of today's computing.

 

And although I have some arguments you might consider, I will join you and not post them to avoid turning this thread into a Mac vs PC analysis. Maybe in some other circumstance we can exchange opinions in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mac G5 Quad, 2.5GHz, 8GB, Spyder Pro Calibration, dual 30" Cinema HD.

 

Mac G4 450, 4GB (I think), same calibration, 22" Cinema.

 

Mac Powerbook 17" G4, 1GHz, 2GB.

 

MacBook Pro 15" C2D, 2.33GHz, 2GB, 30" Cinema HD, Spyder Pro Calibration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MAC:

 

15" MacBook Pro 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 2 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM

 

20" Cinema Display, Nikon Super Coolscan 5000 ED.

 

I'll probably be getting a Spyder 2 Pro Monitor calibrator soon, as well as SilverFast Ai software to run the scanner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Mac's ... not for the "photographic" capabilities but for the possibility of being able to listen to the same music in every room of the house.

We, me and my wife, listen to music 99% of the day and we have a huge house (12 rooms) which we actually frequent. We have setup an Airport configuration, well not us personally, but this enables us to listen to music all around the house at the same time.

 

We currently have 5 mac's of which one, a mac pro, the server thingie of the whole lot, I use for photo editing, I have recently bought a 22" inch Eizo screen to replace the 17" mac and this works fine actually.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment, most of my DNG-handling tools run under Ubuntu Linux (Shuttle XPC, Athlon64, 2 gigs of RAM, 20" Apple Cinema Display)

 

UFRaw handles my raw file conversions:

UFRaw - Home

 

digiKam is an iPhoto-like organizer that handles DNG nicely (v 0.9.x):

http://www.digikam.org/

 

And of course, GIMP for the actual editing:

GIMP - The GNU Image Manipulation Program

 

I also have an iBook G4 with a gig of RAM, but come on, 12" notebook screen versus 20" Cinema Display for photo editing? I will buy a new Mac later on, but right now, Leica has all of my money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All-Mac:

 

dual G5 (2G processors), two 23" HD Cinema Display screens, 2.5 TB storage on FireWire 7,200 r.p.m. drives in addition to two internal drives (I edit video as well as shoot images), 2G RAM. EyeOne Pro colour calibration.

 

MacBook Pro, same specs (core duo 2G; 2G RAM), the 7,200 r.p.m. HD, etc. I run Parallels too, especially for developing web sites (key stroke switches OSs; v. handy).

 

I run and recommend Sophos anti-virus software (a Melissa virus attached to a Word document took a past machine down—and I was running Norton's at the time).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...