Jump to content

Colorimeter choice


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I am debating between an eye one for display only or the colormunki which does monitors and makes printer profiles. Is this a decent tool?

 

I use an iMac Mac 24" matt screen. I have been setting color with the built in color sync utility where I compare the Apple inside a lined square and make it neutral.

 

I send out files for printing at a prolab or sometimes a Kodak 1400 dyesub for quick small work.

 

The goal is to get an inkjet and print on some of the textured papers. I find these unique and much different than photopaper. How bad are manufactures profiles? Or I could just do it like in my darkroom, print, adjust dentity, adjust color, reprint.

 

CS3 has a tranfer section where I can program in (save)changes. This is missing in CS4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

x

No complaints about my Colormunki Photo. I believe it was said elsewhere on this forum that inkjet manufacturers profiles are pretty accurate but I don't know if that extends to the textured papers you want to try. At least with a Colormunki you needn't worry about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

The manufacturer's profiles are not bad, but I found making my own better, especially since you can modify profiles (brightness, contrast, saturation etd) using the software with which you make them.

I started with the x-rite i1 2 display but soon after bought the i1 pro kit so as to be able to make printer profiles and fine tune them when needed.

I am very satisfied with the results, and although I have no experience with the colormunki my experience with x-rite products would lead me to believe that should be very good indeed.

 

regards Maurice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...