Jump to content

Live view


viramati

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't know why some people wants to change the "M philosophy" instead of using another cameras. I use another camera that works much better for Macro and Telephotography. Where is the problem?

There are no other FF cameras without mirror, small and light.

With access to many good lenses.

 

'M' has already changed philosophy by going digital :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

To make it a system camera besides all the SLRs. They dropped them during the early Leicaflex years.

 

So is that an argument for not making the digital M into more of a complete system camera? Wasn't the original "M philosophy" that of a versatile system camera? Why not revive the original M philosophy? Who does it hurt?

 

It is obvious that the less versatile a camera is, the smaller the number of people who find it suits their needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...