danyves Posted October 31, 2009 Share #21 Posted October 31, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Two quick questions: a) Can I load LR3 in addition to LR2, so I can use either? If I work on an image in LR3, and then open it in LR2.5, will there be any problem? I assume that I need to create a new catalog for LR3, and keep them both up to date for a while. Does LR3 expire on a certain date or a certain number of uses? Yes for a) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 31, 2009 Posted October 31, 2009 Hi danyves, Take a look here M8 using Lightroom 3 beta. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Rick Posted October 31, 2009 Share #22 Posted October 31, 2009 He might refer to this (curves adjusted to make it easier visible): I'm not sure that is a banding artifact. I think that might just be the stage curtain or something else in the background. What do you think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spylaw4 Posted October 31, 2009 Share #23 Posted October 31, 2009 Two quick questions: a) Can I load LR3 in addition to LR2, so I can use either? If I work on an image in LR3, and then open it in LR2.5, will there be any problem? I assume that I need to create a new catalog for LR3, and keep them both up to date for a while. Does LR3 expire on a certain date or a certain number of uses? a) Yes You will need to import your image separately as LR3 uses a different catalogue. You should find more camera calibration options in LR3. LR3 expires IIRC 30/4/2010 or 4/30/2010 depending on what side of the pond you're on. LR3 is definitely a step upward and well worth trying out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlmuck Posted November 3, 2009 Share #24 Posted November 3, 2009 He might refer to this (curves adjusted to make it easier visible): What you see in the dark sections is not noise banding but the wing curtains off-stage. The fact that you can see relief in the curtains (the folds) is actually, to me, a testament to the ability of the M8 to render deep shadow detail. I've not (ever) noticed any noise banding with my M8. carl. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wda Posted November 3, 2009 Share #25 Posted November 3, 2009 I'm using LR3 and think it's great. I've created a preset that mimics my favourite M8 setting: black and white jpeg with standard sharpening and high contrast. I've never been able to convince C1 to reproduce the look of in-camera B&W jpegs from DNGs. Anyway, if anyone wants to try it, I've uploaded it here: RapidShare: 1-CLICK Web hosting - Easy Filehosting I could not get your link to work without subscribing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShivaYash Posted November 3, 2009 Share #26 Posted November 3, 2009 I've tried it but feel that Aperture is far better. Also, Aperture X is due soon! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
guidomo Posted November 5, 2009 Share #27 Posted November 5, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Is LR3 stable enough to use? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spylaw4 Posted November 5, 2009 Share #28 Posted November 5, 2009 Is LR3 stable enough to use? Seems to be pretty stable - no problems so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.