Search the Community

The Leica X-type cameras no longer stimulate much forum activity. So, notwithstanding a short thread on this topic which contained some useful information, I am seeking wider views from owners of this camera, particularly those who have upgraded from X1 or X2 and from those contemplating purchase of the new model. When the Leica X was first announced I was excited by the lens upgrade (Elmarit to Summilux), having expected to see a Summicron used. (Semantically, the Leica marketing people have rather stretched the accepted modern definition that a Summilux lens has a starting aperture of f/1.4) However the increase in bulk, weight and depth, indicated that it would not be an effective replacement for me as a ‘pocket’ camera. My X1 yields so many good pictures because it is the only camera with me on non-photographic outings. I have grown to accept that fact despite having an X Vario and M. So an upgrade to Leica X would not displace the X1 for me. From a pure specification point of view, these appear to be the main advantages and disadvantages of the upgrade from X1 to X (Typ 113): Advantages Higher resolution (16.2 cf. 12.2 M) Faster lens (greater than 1 EV) Improved ergonomics (provided a hand-grip is included) Closer minimum focusing (20 cm cf. 30 cm) Increased sensitivity (3200 cf. 12500) Better monitor resolution (920,000 cf. 230,000 pixels) and also very slightly larger monitor. Disadvantages Heavier (486 g cf. 286 g) Depth (78 mm cf. 32 mm) I don’t question the added performance; but it seems that it would not replace my X1 for those occasions when photography is not top of the agenda. So, for those who now own the new Leica X, please share your experiences and conclusions with me (and others who might take a similar view to me). Thank you.