Jump to content

A good color negative


batmax

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm serching a good negative with briliant colour ( similar to the slides) with medium iso

sensibility to be scanned after the develop.

Now I'm using kodak ultra color 400 but I'm not so happy.

This film seems to have cold colours and not so briliant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuji pro 400H or 160S is indeed a good choice but if you're searching for high contrast and saturation the Fuji pro 160C (or the pro 800Z, iso 800) is the choice.

 

Here some examples of the 160C version, M7, Summicron, without any filters.

 

1382758990_c536c46f22.jpg

 

1382759862_6eb118da64.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this film developed in minilab or professional lab?

 

nor both, I have developed the film at home:

 

http://shop.fotohuisrovo.nl/product_info.php?cPath=31_46&products_id=166

 

But C41 is C41:

 

C41 dev. 3:15 min at 37,8 degrees C.

Blix 6:30 min.

wash: 3:00 min.

stabilizer: 1:00 min.

 

drying and ready to scan or print.

 

The only side effect from this K54 Amaloco kit is that the orange mask is a little bit darker then films from the mini-lab.

 

Maybe your question about the deviation of a C41 developing process:

At home: 37,8 +0,5 -1 degrees C. and a good professional lab: 37,8 +/- 0,3 degrees C.

However the Amaloco kit has some more tolerance about the developing temperature.

 

The only thing I know for sure:

Fresh C41 developer, no scratches, dust, finger prints unless you make the mistake yourself :)

 

 

From the same film and topic (Prague, Czech Republic):

 

1381862569_3234341ac9.jpg

 

Driving around in an old fashioned Skoda.

 

best regards,

 

Robert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in a similar boat, still looking for a satisfying color neg film. I have intermittent success, or at least a few that I like, with Kodak Portra 400NC and like others have already mentioned, Fuji Pro 400H. Here's a couple examples of what I typically see, though I have these push processed 1 full stop and then scan on a Nikon 9000.

 

1st one is the Kodak Portra, the 2nd is the Fuji.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since a couple of years I've been using Kodak Porta 160 VC and 400 VC and I'm very satisified with the results. Since I don't do my own processing I've developed (!) a good relation with a local lab which produces excellent results (as long as the software behind the camera functions :) )

 

No, I don't have a scanner to show any of it, but it's on the to-buy-list...

 

Lars

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...