|
|
|||||||
| Digital Post Processing Forum This forum is about digitally processing your Leica photos: B&W conversion, enhancing contrast, sharpening, printing, etc. |
The Leica Camera Forum is the biggest Leica community worldwide.
Please register, if you want to use all features of the Leica Forum.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free!
![]() |
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 14.04.2007
Posts: 116
|
I'm currently using a Minolta Scan Elite 5400 scanner but am losing confidence in it due to software and hardware error messages. Looking at current scanners, they seem to be mainly of the flatbed variety.
What do you use? Anyone using the CanoScan 8800F ? I want quality over anything else. Thanks, Mike. |
|
|
|
| Advertisement (gone after free registration) |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 11.06.2009
Location: Westminster, MD, USA
Posts: 202
|
For 35 mm, the Nikon SuperScan 5000 is fabulous.
If you also need medium format scanning, the Nikon 9000 is the way to go. I use an older Nikon 8000 for my scans. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 14.04.2007
Posts: 116
|
Thanks for the prompt replies. My understanding is that both of these scanners are discontinued products. The majority of film scanners now seem to be either multi-format or from the Plustec range. If i have to pay for a multi-format scanner to get top quality 35mm scans, I will, but I assume that flatbed scanning has improved since I bought my Minolta 5400. Anyone using Epson Perfection V750 Pro?
I've just bought a Leica MP so quality is essential. Cheers, Mike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 19.11.2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,185
|
Mike,
I have a Epson 700 for my medium format film, it is quite good but takes longer time than my CoolScan 5000 for 35mm film (particuarly because the coolscan have rollfilm handeling) The epson take a good deal of time for ICE - but the scans are beautiful and for the price its a good deal. I played with the thought of getting into wet scanning but said forget it. . |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 07.05.2006
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3,115
|
Mike, I had both the Nikon 5000 and Epson 750. I used the Nikon for 35mm and the 750 for Medium Format. (I now have the Nikon 9000 which serves for both and gives better 35mm results than the 5000) I'm sorry to have to tell you that for 35mm the Nikon is much better than the Epson. Although it is discontinued you should still be able to get one secondhand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Erfahrener Benutzer
Join Date: 08.11.2006
Posts: 199
|
Hi,
The Nikon scanners are truly excellent I have the 8000 and the results leave nothing to be desired. I have seen some ads for 35mm only (5000) still available new from dealers who still have stock (here in Holland) at about 1400 Euros if I remember. So a search might be useful if you don't need any size other than 35mm. maurice |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|