ian748s Posted March 1, 2007 Share #1 Posted March 1, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) I have bought one of these s/h in near mint condition. The lens collapses and extends. Should the lens 'lock' in the collapsed position or just in the extended position? Unfortunately I have no instructions to refer to. Thanks in anticipation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 1, 2007 Posted March 1, 2007 Hi ian748s, Take a look here Question about 50mm Elmar M. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
doubice Posted March 1, 2007 Share #2 Posted March 1, 2007 Ian, The lens will only lock in the extended position. Cheers, Jan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill Posted March 1, 2007 Share #3 Posted March 1, 2007 "Lock" is a relative term. There is no audible click or anything, so don't listen for one! This is a great lens, that produces exceptional results, particularly stopped down slightly. It was my only 50 for years and makes any M a perfect travel camera. Regards, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian748s Posted March 1, 2007 Author Share #4 Posted March 1, 2007 Thanks both of you. It really is a superb lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
visiondr Posted March 3, 2007 Share #5 Posted March 3, 2007 This is my only lens and all I can say is "perfect". It is small, sturdy with very fine resolution and contrast. Ron Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/17548-question-about-50mm-elmar-m/?do=findComment&comment=188554'>More sharing options...
lars_bergquist Posted March 4, 2007 Share #6 Posted March 4, 2007 Which lens are we talking about -- the 1958 Elmar or the current one? The oldtimer differs notably from the classical 3.5 Elmar in that the contrast is somewhat less on axis, but the definition is much more even across the entire image. It also holds up very well at close focusing range, in fact even closer (with a 'spider legs' bayonet copy stand, for instance). Be advised that the most convenient lens hood for this dear old Elmar is actually the same one sold for the current lens. No. 12549 is bright chrome on the outside and black on the inside, 12550 is all black, and the lovely original chromed lens cap with the Leica logo slips right on its front! Now you only need a chromed E39 UVa filter ... The clip-on hoods are a pain to use with an M6 or later, because the thick base is in the way when you try to adjust the aperture with the camera raised to your eye. The old man from the Age of Four-element Lenses Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian748s Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share #7 Posted March 4, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Which lens are we talking about -- the 1958 Elmar or the current one? The oldtimer differs notably from the classical 3.5 Elmar in that the contrast is somewhat less on axis, but the definition is much more even across the entire image. It also holds up very well at close focusing range, in fact even closer (with a 'spider legs' bayonet copy stand, for instance). Be advised that the most convenient lens hood for this dear old Elmar is actually the same one sold for the current lens. No. 12549 is bright chrome on the outside and black on the inside, 12550 is all black, and the lovely original chromed lens cap with the Leica logo slips right on its front! Now you only need a chromed E39 UVa filter ... The clip-on hoods are a pain to use with an M6 or later, because the thick base is in the way when you try to adjust the aperture with the camera raised to your eye. The old man from the Age of Four-element Lenses It's the current one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.