erg Posted October 18, 2009 Share #1 Posted October 18, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Is there any difference between the Elmarit 2,8/90 mm lenses produced during the last years coming with the white or the grey box ? Thanks, E. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 Hi erg, Take a look here Latest generation Elmarit 2,8 / 90. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Photon42 Posted October 18, 2009 Share #2 Posted October 18, 2009 I'm tempted to say there's no difference. Mine was from 1992 (white box, of course) and could not spot any difference more recent copies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lars_bergquist Posted October 18, 2009 Share #3 Posted October 18, 2009 It does happen that lenses are recomputed without any announcement or formal change of designation. The reason is usually to ease manufacture by a slight redesign, or to compensate for the unavailability of a glass used in the original design, and the like. There is no fanfare because the object was to maintain the original performance, not to change it. Sometimes the change is detected by the crowds outside the gate, which then by consensus decree a new 'version code', which is of course totally inofficial and fundamentally arbitrary. The notion that a change in packaging would coincide with such a technical adjustment except by the merest and most improbable coincidence, is competely unfounded however. The old man from the Age of Red Cartons Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted October 21, 2009 Share #4 Posted October 21, 2009 I read one owner said the close permormance was improved. That or they don`t see how the close performance derteriorates with that lens. It is hard to tell whether posters are knowledgeable or not. There was no official change to that glass design either M or R version. They have the same glass by the way. Leica will tell you they go a little soft up close, at least they did years back. If close performance is imortant, the 90 2.8 Elmarit visoflex is the one to get. The optical unit removes for use on a short focus mount or bellows and it is made for infinity to up close. The shortcoming is a liffle more softness at 2.8. Pick your poison or buy both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lars_bergquist Posted October 21, 2009 Share #5 Posted October 21, 2009 [ ... ] It is hard to tell whether posters are knowledgeable or not. [ ... ]. Indeed. Some people convince themselves that they see the darnedest things. But I do no know of any change in the formula. Pretty well all lenses do get marginally softer near the close focusing limit. Some, like the collapsible Summicron, not so marginally either. As for the first Elmarit -- I presume you refer to the one where you could unscrew the optical cell from the focusing unit -- I have worked quite a lot with it, both with and without the Viso. It is not too bad at 5.6 or so, but contrast is low when wide open, and yes, definition does fall off close up! It is after all a pretty primitive five element design, a Hektor actually. Go for the 90mm Macro instead. Or buy a Nikon ... The old man from the Age of the Visoflex I Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.