Jump to content

Testing of M9


ulrikft

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

So, today I tested the M9 a bit. First of all, high iso quality was not as bad as expected. A lot of noise at 2500, but also a lot of signal. It retains LOTS of detail at 2500.

 

Detail and lack of noise at 160 was brilliant.

 

What did I not like? the speed of startup/ready and speed of checking images. That was abysmally slow.. maybe old firmware on the camera i tried?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ulrikft,

 

The one I played with at Samy's last week was pretty comparable to the M8, I did not find it to be slow, possible the low-rez preview did come up a slight bit faster, but it did load the full-rez about the same maybe a slight slower, which kind of made since since its pretty big files but still.

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to hear from other on this -- based on my very limited experience, the newest firmware didn't make a difference. (Tried an M9 at a camera shop with old firmware, they then updated to newest, and zooming was still very slow). Now, I wasn't testing zooming per say, so can't quantify.

 

Would like to hear from others on this as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...