Jump to content

Hessenpark News: Official - No R10: no FF M9 (yet)


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Stefan Daniel has been speaking at the Forum meeting in Hessenpark

 

I have just received a text from Carl Bretteville, who is there and attending the Q&A session.

 

"From Stefan Daniel: there will be no R10 from Leica, but there will be a good solution that allows us to use our R-lenses on a digital body."

 

Now we need to wait and see what that solution is - but it should be quicker to market than the R10 might have been.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 419
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Interesting, but I am not going to try to second guess this. I can already use my Leica R glass on a DSLR, so this must be something else.

 

Steve, did you have to use the V-word??

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that's what we might reasonably have expected. The R system has been discontinued so they are hardly likely to resurrect it.

 

My money is on S10 as well - the 10 implying continuity from the R8, R9, the S cross over to the new digital platform derived from the S2.

 

Impressed that Carl has travelled from Norway to Solms for the event.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's all we have at the moment, and that's hot off the press, and from the horse's mouth

 

I'll text some of the other guys out there to see if we can glean any more, before they get too stuck into the Weissbier

 

Has to be more than just a name change, though

 

There are quite a few UK members there this year (I'd have been there again too...) and Carl and Ivar B both attended last year. It's a great weekend out.

 

Edit: Others have their phones switched off...

Link to post
Share on other sites
"From Stefan Daniel: there will be no R10 from Leica, but there will be a good solution that allows us to use our R-lenses on a digital body."

 

One question of course is whether it will be a Leica solution, or have they done a deal with Canon or Nikon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I think that's what we might reasonably have expected. The R system has been discontinued so they are hardly likely to resurrect it.

 

Mark's right. Why go backwards? The AFRIKA platform is the way ahead for Leica DSLRs and as a platform for SLR glass..

 

Watching with interest.

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark, if the implication is that existing R lenses could be used on a Nikon or Canon then they'd have to have persuaded one of them to provide a modified body with aperture cam, as while stop down metering might be fine for some of us I can't see Leica describing it as a 'good' solution. The follow on from that is that I can't see any of the big boys redesigning their camera body to provide the mechanical linkage.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that's what we might reasonably have expected. The R system has been discontinued so they are hardly likely to resurrect it.

 

The way I read the text, and I quoted it in its entirety, is that there is no camera coming AT ALL, no matter what you want to call it. The solution lies elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites
My money is on S10 as well - the 10 implying continuity from the R8, R9, the S cross over to the new digital platform derived from the S2.

 

I'm sure you'll be no S10 either.

 

Here's Leica's solution provided by Panasonic ... and yes, it's a 4/3, and I fully expect them to call it Digilux 4 and the influx of 4/3 trolls.

 

 

Note, Panasonic officially says that you can't use the latest 21 lux and 24 lux with the M adapter.

 

The way I read the text, and I quoted it in its entirety, is that there is no camera coming AT ALL, no matter what you want to call it. The solution lies elsewhere.

 

I think you're right on, Andy ... you should have started another thread and let Mark put his money down first.

Edited by sdai
Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm about to go about for a meal. I wonder how many posts there'll be when I get back in? I reckon 200.

 

Some things are more important than meals...

 

I'll text you - leave your phone on

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sure you'll be no S10 either.

 

Here's Leica's solution provided by Panasonic ... and yes, it's a 4/3, and I fully expect them to call it Digilux 4 and the influx of 4/3 trolls.

 

Note, Panasonic officially says that you can't use the latest 21 lux and 24 lux with the M adapter.

 

Stefan Daniel said that there would be a "good solution"

 

4/3 is not a good solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next text:

 

"They believe the market for the S system is 10000 units. New noctis will be delivered in larger number from June/July. The technology in the S2 was done in house and is seen as a dev platform for new systems."

 

Some of this we knew already.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Stefan Daniel said that there would be a "good solution"

 

4/3 is not a good solution.

 

It may not be good for you but good for him.

 

Anyways, did he really say that there'll be no camera at all???

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark, if the implication is that existing R lenses could be used on a Nikon or Canon then they'd have to have persuaded one of them to provide a modified body with aperture cam, as while stop down metering might be fine for some of us I can't see Leica describing it as a 'good' solution. The follow on from that is that I can't see any of the big boys redesigning their camera body to provide the mechanical linkage.

 

Leica of course teamed up with Minolta in the past and you could envisage cooperation between Leica and Canon/Nikon/Sony/Pentax (maybe) to either produce a rebadged camera which supports both R lenses and that manufacturer's own lenses. The manufacturer will know there's a limited population of lenses out there (assuming R lens production is finished) so better to have R users buying your camera to put their glass on it than someone else's.

 

Either that or take Stefan Daniel's statement at face value. No R10 because we won't be calling it that, but something else instead (derived from the S2).

Edited by marknorton
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...