Jump to content

Is it only me or is this too cheap?


alw

Recommended Posts

It is neither extremely cheap nor very expensive.

 

The information given by the seller don't seem to be very exact. With a serial no. 126.... it was made 1935, not 1933. The first - black - III start with 107601 - 107757 in 1934.

 

What you can see on the photos the body is not in excellent condition. The verbal description is so so.

 

If you look at very trustworthy specialized dealers - with high prices - you might find a black III, condition B, serial no. 124xxx with an Elmar lens for 500,- €.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say that's a mean right price for this item ... but, personally, I wouldn't like to buy such an item on ebay... model III can have a lot of small details that can result "wrong" when carefully inspected (I mean, not original, badly restored etc...) : being it a not rare item, originality is the main factor for a correct value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

At the moment there are quite a few black IIIs on E-Bay around the globe...so you can choose:)

A question to the experts on this particular one...is it possible that the Vulcanite is new? It looks like it is a bit heavy in grain. If I look at my black III...mine has a slightly softer grain!

 

cheers

Uwe

 

PS: I love black LTM cameras, especially the ones with nickel knobs and some nice patina...somehow they look even more 30s than their chrome sisters:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi there

 

 

A question to the experts on this particular one...is it possible that the Vulcanite is new? It looks like it is a bit heavy in grain. If I look at my black III...mine has a slightly softer grain!

 

cheers

Uwe

 

:D

 

I think you might be right, Ewe. Both my chrome and black III's have a finer grain pattern.

 

Len

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you might be right, Ewe. Both my chrome and black III's have a finer grain pattern.

 

Len

 

Yes, I looked at the pictures with more attention, the cover I'd say is "wrong"... and I have some suspect also looking at the bottom removed... as I said, these are cameras for is mandatory to give a serious and direct inspection to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...