Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes, Jerry. But WHEN will they finish tweaking the elusive firmware?

 

Ugly or not, the new baby has to be shown to the many relatives in the waiting room sometime.

 

The last day of Photokina presents a fine platform for this pixel unveiling, don't you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some images were printed in the BJP magazine last week.

I saw them - but it's impossible to tell from a magazine print.

Patience may be a virtue, but it's not one I have!

On the other hand - it's only worth seeing beta firmware samples if they're good - bad ones do nothing except give the camera a bad start to life (witness the Kodak 14n which ended up being quite good).

Kind Regards

Jono Slack

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The proof is in the pudding." If we don't have images it's because Leica doesn't have anything convincing to show at this time. I hope that changes soon. I'm eager to see what this new M camera will deliver. Until then, I can't really begin to consider making a major, major, purchase for a new Leica (not to mention a new wide-angle Leica lens). I'd also like to see tests with Voiglander lenses.

 

Cheers,

Wilfredo+

Benitez-Rivera Photography

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking forward to see available light pictures of the M8.

 

The official pictures seen until now don´t say anything about the high iso performance of the M8.

 

The M-System was the best for available light so i hope the M8 will be very good in this range. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is NOTHING absurd about wanting to see at least some DECENT iso160 and iso320 raw files while they are fiddling with the refinements for the rest. Many of us would like to see a bit of convincing material prior to making a purchase decision, especially in light of all the rumors that are flying around!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest word I have from Leica is that review cameras (production firmware) will be going out in the USA after 10/15.

 

Cheers,

 

Sean

 

Well if I have to wait, then I must spend the next two weeks speculating about the 4 pictures we do have

 

WE HAVE

 

*The GIRL @ ISO 320* Virtually noise free. Resolution around the eye and chin to die for. The best of 4. RAW

 

*The CELL PHONE @ ISO 320* Looks pretty good but requires hours of more analysis. RAW

 

*The HALL #1 @ ISO 160* Not too bad considering it's underexposed, shot into the light and crooked. The first of the purloined pixes. JPEG

 

* The HALL #2 @ ISO 1250 Same as HALL #1 except shot at ISO 1250. Shows some noise that easily cleans up with no lose of sharpness (Neat Image). My favorite because it shows that a underexposed picture @ 1250 ISO can be salvaged. JPEG

 

*Erwin Puts's bad JEPGs. Not much use since he forgot to focus the camera. He does have an interesting shot of what happens when you take a picture of a star pattern with a camera without an anti-alising filter. You get a moire pattern. DUH!!!

 

To say that there is a dearth of photos out there to over analyse would be putting it mildly. But beggers can't be chosers:D

 

Rex

arf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rex,

 

I've seen all of these lovely pieces (none of which are good photographs) except for HALL #1.

Could you give me the URL for that one?

 

BTW, this is exactly as poor an introduction via pictures as Epson gave the R-D1. In fact, I thought the early R-D1 pics were taken by people with severely impaired eyesight.

 

Jerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rex,

 

I've seen all of these lovely pieces (none of which are good photographs) except for HALL #1.

Could you give me the URL for that one?

 

BTW, this is exactly as poor an introduction via pictures as Epson gave the R-D1. In fact, I thought the early R-D1 pics were taken by people with severely impaired eyesight.

 

Jerry

 

Yah, you'd think that Leica would let a few pictures "leak" into circulation just to counter the bad ones. However, have you ever noticed that when the manufactures actually end up publishing official pictures, they're bad too?

 

It's the same way when people post pictures of there photo equipment to sell on the internet. Always out of focus .

 

Rex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...