Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is often stated that chrome has bluish reflections and nickel has yellow/golden reflections.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe this comparison with another lens of around the same vintage will tell something. I believe I do see more "yellowishness" in the Summar. What does the different finish do to the respective value of a Chrome vs a Silver/Nickel Summar? (The Hektor here does NOT have a ding in its front flange; I had to reduce the resolution from the original to post.) 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking 'yellowisher" than the IIf, right?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Starbuck said:

Looking 'yellowisher" than the IIf, right?

Definitely nickel. It takes some time and experience to tell the difference, as nickel plating can vary all the way from 'almost chrome ' to 'bright yellow' or 'almost gold' The various books such as Thiele's can also be misleading as chrome versions can appear in the middle of nickel batches and vice versa. I have discussed this at length with Jim Lager. I once obtained a chrome Hektor which appeared to be in the middle of a nickel batch, but when I asked Jim about it he pointed out that other chrome samples from the same batch appeared in his lens book. The more you study the history of Leica the more you will realise that there are many exceptions to the 'rules'. 

William 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification.

I read Lager on the Summars, and he seemed to indicate that finishes may be "mixed" as to production date/serial number sequence.

Is one finish considered more valuable or rare for the Rigid models?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Starbuck said:

Thanks for the clarification.

I read Lager on the Summars, and he seemed to indicate that finishes may be "mixed" as to production date/serial number sequence.

Is one finish considered more valuable or rare for the Rigid models?

The chrome Rigid Summars are more rare and are, therefore, more valuable.

https://collectiblend.com/Lenses/Leitz/50mm-f2-Summar-(SM,-rigid,-nickel).html

https://collectiblend.com/Lenses/Leitz/50mm-f2-Summar-(SM,-rigid,-chrome).html

William 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...