Popular Post benqui Posted May 10 Popular Post Share #1 Posted May 10 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hope not to flood the forum too much but I used the BF a lot for indoor portraits mit natural light. Here with the 2/65 Thanks for watching Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 26 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/421129-adelina/?do=findComment&comment=5799403'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 10 Posted May 10 Hi benqui, Take a look here Adelina. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
stuny Posted May 10 Share #2 Posted May 10 Excellent! Don't forget to tell us of your BF experience in bright sunlight. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted May 12 Author Share #3 Posted May 12 Am 10.5.2025 um 17:28 schrieb stuny: Excellent! Don't forget to tell us of your BF experience in bright sunlight. For sure I will Stuart! Thanks a lot Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NigelG Posted May 12 Share #4 Posted May 12 (edited) Flood away… I'm interested in the BF as a replacement for my TL2 as a non-M/Q camera (yes I have too many) but always use the TL2 with the Visoflex and sometimes use MF - how does that work at arms-length? Edited May 12 by NigelG Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted May 13 Author Share #5 Posted May 13 vor 13 Stunden schrieb NigelG: Flood away… I'm interested in the BF as a replacement for my TL2 as a non-M/Q camera (yes I have too many) but always use the TL2 with the Visoflex and sometimes use MF - how does that work at arms-length? I never thought that I could use a camera without a viewfinder, but working „at arms-length“ was very easy. After maybe 30 minutes it wasn‘t a problem anymore. But I think I would never use Leica M lenses with an adapter because I believe that manual focusing is a bit too difficult and time consuming with the BF. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC-S5 Posted May 15 Share #6 Posted May 15 But I think I would never use Leica M lenses with an adapter because I believe that manual focusing is a bit too difficult and time consuming with the BF. Marc, especially as the matching SIGMA AF lenses have a quality that guarantees a wonderful reproduction, especially for portraits. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
benqui Posted May 15 Author Share #7 Posted May 15 Advertisement (gone after registration) vor 13 Minuten schrieb DC-S5: But I think I would never use Leica M lenses with an adapter because I believe that manual focusing is a bit too difficult and time consuming with the BF. Marc, especially as the matching SIGMA AF lenses have a quality that guarantees a wonderful reproduction, especially for portraits. As I can with your wonderful portraits, the Sigma lenses seem to work excellent. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.a8c0eceb5c93f775e75e8b4465e4cf9c.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.