Jump to content

They Don't Make Them Like They Used To


john_r_smith

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I’m going to briefly break a Forum rule here, because this was not shot with a Leica camera – but hold on a moment before you flame me down - I think Leicas were probably not around when this camera was made in 1925 (and I promise not to post any more non-Leica shots, honest). The instrument concerned is a folding quarter-plate view camera, with ground-glass screen and a set of darkslides, and a roll-film back which gives eight 6x9cm negatives on 120. It has a simple leaf shutter, and a Jos Schneider 135mm, f6.3 lens. It is all in perfect condition, including the leather bellows, with nickel-plated and black enamelled metal parts. I bought it about 25 years ago for silly money, and haven’t used it for a while, but a couple of weeks ago I dragged it out of its case, cleaned it all up, and put a roll of film through just for old time’s sake. I got the film processed and scanned by a lab, and here is a sample. Not bad for an eighty-year old camera, with no lens coating, I think – and it rather puts this digital stuff into perspective, doesn’t it? (will any digital camera made today still be working in 2096 – seems unlikely).

 

Schneider Kreutznach 135mm, f18, 1/50s, Kodak Portra 160NC, scanned to 6MP jpeg

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan

 

thanks for your reply. Yes, I can certainly get a photo of the old camera with my LC1 - in fact it would be really great if someone here could identify it, as there is no maker's name anywhere. The Lens is a Rodinar Anastigmat (very simple -only three elements).

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice photo John

. Whilst I think some Leica film camera's will still be around in 2096 doubt if our LC1 will be of any use.One of the reasons I still wonder if we are wise to shift to digital.It's all moving so quickly now and yet the end result is almost the same. You could have taken that photo and posted all in a few mins in digital.Bet it took a while to create it from your old camera and that you had loads of fun.

Robin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Er, yes Robin, taking the picture was a slightly more complicated procedure than getting the LC1 out and pressing the shutter :)

 

First off you set up the tripod, mount the camera, unfold the bellows and set up the cable release. Open the lens right up to f6.3, and open the shutter using the 'T' setting. Then you pop open the hood on the ground glass screen, place a black cloth over your head, and frame up - the image is upside down of course, and pretty dim, so focussing is not easy, even with the help of the black cloth. When everything looks good, take out the trusty Weston Master II (made in 1946), get a reading, close the shutter and set aperture and speed (we've only got three speeds, 1/25, 1/50 and 1/100s). Now remove the ground glass screen, replace it with the roll-film back, carefully pull out the dark-slide, and take the picture. Replace the dark slide (very important!), remove the roll-film back, wind on to the next frame (also very important and easy to forget) - phew - and we are ready to take the next picture. As you can imagine, this is makes the camera a little unsuitable for candid or street photography - and it's probably why Kate is looking a bit bored in the picture :)

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well

 

just in case you blokes are still interested, here is a quick snap of the view camera - (taken with the LC1, 90mm, f2.4) - which shows you the main features. As I said, there is no maker's name on the camera, but the lens serial number dates it to between 1925 and 1927, according to the Schneider website. It has a simple Vero shutter, rising and cross front, a wire-frame sports finder (!) and a simple optical finder too. I don't use those myself, just the ground-glass back. The main body is wood, covered with some sort of leatherette material, everything else seems to be brass, either nickel-plated or black enamelled. The lens is a peach, even though it has no coating. Does anyone know what the camera is?

 

John

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...