cesc Posted November 20 Share #1 Posted November 20 Advertisement (gone after registration) I started with a 35mm Summicron v4 attached to my M6, then added a 50mm v4. However, I eventually sold everything and transitioned to an M3 with a 50mm Sonnar. The journey continued, and now, as I focus primarily on shooting indoor documentary family photos, the 35mm has become my preferred focal length. Yet, I've found myself missing the experience of shooting with a 50mm lens, especially when I'm outdoors and prefer to maintain some distance from my subjects. Consequently, I am contemplating acquiring a budget-friendly 50mm lens. While I appreciated the Sonnar, the focus shift and the minimum focus distance of 0.9m are aspects I'd like to avoid in my main 50mm lens, or everyday lens. I particularly enjoyed the Summicron v4 due to its focus tab, finding it to be quick and efficient for focusing. Although I haven't had the chance to try the Rigid v2, I am drawn to its design. Admittedly, it might seem trivial, but I believe it would complement my chrome MP beautifully. Additionally, I am considering the Planar (in chrome) as a strong contender for the role of my everyday 50mm lens. Your experiences with those lenses could really help me figure out my decision. I lean more towards vintage lenses rather than razor-sharp, contrasty images. I shoot film, mainly in black and white. I actually sold my 35 FLE because it felt too perfect for my taste. Right now, I'm really enjoying the Nokton 35 1.4 vII, and I've been considering moving to a pre-asph lux someday. Just thought I'd share that info to help with the decision for the 50mm focal length. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 20 Posted November 20 Hi cesc, Take a look here 50mm lens - Planar or Summicron Rigid V2 / V4 or any other candidate?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Ecar Posted November 24 Share #2 Posted November 24 On 11/20/2023 at 10:48 PM, cesc said: I lean more towards vintage lenses rather than razor-sharp, contrasty images. Get the Rigid. 105012 and cesc 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted November 24 Share #3 Posted November 24 2 hours ago, Ecar said: Get the Rigid. Take this advice. He knows what he's talking about. 105012, Ecar and cesc 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted November 24 Share #4 Posted November 24 I have a Planar and consider it to be a viable alternative to a modern Summicron - but its high-contrast rendering isn't "vintage". Ecar, paulleica and cesc 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted November 24 Share #5 Posted November 24 If you want to split hairs, there are actually two slightly different versions of the Rigid: the most visible cosmetic difference is the thinner focus ring of the earlier version. Although the optical formula is in principle the same, I find that the later version renders a bit more modern, possibly due to different coatings. Not a huge difference, but noticeable upon close inspection, esp. in the corners. As for the Planar, it's definitely one of the sharpest/highest-contrast lenses I own. Too much for my taste in most circumstances - at least on digital. The Rigid is a great choice, but if your 50mm doesn't need to be in native M mount and you are happy to use an LTM->M adapter ring, there are dozens of other vintage options available. 105012 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.