Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

There are three newcomers to my M lens family: G28 Biogon, G45 Planar and G90 Sonnar.

Has anyone 6 bit coded these lenses? I wondered what would be the best profiles for these. My initial thoughts were:

28mm as Elmarit 28 - 011100

45mm as Summicron 50 - 100001

90mm as Tele-Elmarit 90 - 000100

Any thoughts, comments, please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

...if anyone wants to see what these look like. 90mm not yet converted.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 10/15/2023 at 5:36 AM, Al Brown said:

45 would probably be better coded as Summicron-M 35mm f/2 (IV) 000110

A little bit behind on this thread and already coded it as Summicron 50mm, but why would you think so?
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

90mm came in today. I am so bad at this, but the camera doesn't think so, it recognizes my coding masterwork.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

90mm came in today.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I am so bad at this, but the camera doesn't think so, it recognizes my coding masterwork.

Edited by mirekti
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On 10/14/2023 at 10:37 PM, mirekti said:

...if anyone wants to see what these look like. 90mm not yet converted.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Is it a rework-lens from Taiwan? Did you do conversion yourself,  I am curious is it possible to have the lenses focus closer than 0.7 m?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Carlos cruz said:

Is it a rework-lens from Taiwan? Did you do conversion yourself,  I am curious is it possible to have the lenses focus closer than 0.7 m?

Yes. I did 28 and 45 myself. Received 90mm converted. I was told 90mm couldn't be adjusted and it would be a hit or a miss. The only guarantee was it focuses "correctly" on his (seller's) M camera. When I received it, mine was front focusing, but I took it apart and luckily removing a single shim fixed it for me.

Not sure about closer than 0.7m. The lenses certainly (at least 28 and 45) can focus closer in their original form.
I am happy it stops at 0.7 so I can use the RF precisely, but for those would would want to use them with SL (or any other mirrorless) could benefit from closer focus.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 10/15/2023 at 12:36 PM, Al Brown said:

45 would probably be better coded as Summicron-M 35mm f/2 (IV) 000110

Sorry for excavating old thread, I’ve tried to find any leads on how to best code planar 45,  your suggestion to code it as 35 or s interesting but I can’t find any sources for that or comprehend logic behind it, if I have a set of g lenses how I am supposed to code planar 35, same as 45? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...