Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

44 minutes ago, 250swb said:

No, anybody with even a half ass comprehension of the job can file a bit off the flange, it isn't a unique selling point as if it adds value. You definitely don't need to send it to a camera tech guy who may charge actual money to do it.

Your response is rude, certainly the tone is inappropriate.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, lct said:

Filing off a flange is one thing but adding metal to it is another story.
That's what a repair shop has done on this Rokkor 28/2.8 of mine but i don't know whom.

Β 

I've had lenses fixed by DAG before, that's who will be adding metal so the Minolta CLE reads the lens as a 40mm and gives the appropriate framelines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, lct said:

I would ask DAG if he can mount an unmodified 40mm flange instead, this way you would keep the modified flange when you want to bring up 35mm framelines on M cameras.

That's an interesting thought but I have two Leica 35mm lenses that I use most often on Leica M bodies. Only intend to use Leica Cron 40mm on Minolta CLE>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too bad to ruin the work done on it then. Some M users would dream to have a 6-bit coded Summicron 40 bringing up 35mm framelines. I've seen that you don't like this idea but my best advice would be selling the lens as is or asking DAG if they can find a normal flange for it. FWIW.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lct said:

Too bad to ruin the work done on it then. Some M users would dream to have a 6-bit coded Summicron 40 bringing up 35mm framelines. I've seen that you don't like this idea but my best advice would be selling the lens as is or asking DAG if they can find a normal flange for it. FWIW.

"ruin"? I'm gonna do whatever I want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jaapv said:

Please improve the tone of this conversation. Xveruskax: people are only trying to help you.Β 

Thanks. My question was answered by a few helpful users early on but now it’s devolved into getting lectured.Β 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 01af said:

Filing down a 40-mm lens to bring up the 35-mm frame lines in an M camera is nothing but vandalism.

I don’t agree, for many their 40mm ceased to be useful when their last CL died. And given it’s a DIY job I applaud those liberated people who did the conversion themselves without getting sucked into the fear and trepidation associated with everything Leica. So it’s nothing special, and it keeps the price of the lens neutral but increases the usability. Of course it’s possible to try and remember how much to allow for around the edge of the frame on an M body with an unmodified lens, but using multiple lenses on a body and they should all trigger a similar instinct when putting the camera to the eye without an intellectual battle taking place.

Edited by 250swb
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 01af said:

You define 'vandalism' as tinkering with holy relics!? :blink:

Or a work of art or whatever, but adapting a tool is not in my mind.However, I agree that it is a completely senseless action. If you know how to use an optical viewfinder it is the easiest thing in the world to extrapolate a 40 mm field of view from 50 or 35 mm framelines. Actually you should know before you put the camera to your eye.Β 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...