Jump to content

Does developing a blank roll use up developer ?


grahamc

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

hello 

I 'developed' a roll of C41 film that didn't include any photographs (loading error!).  Of course the roll came out blank.  

In terms of the life (roll-count) of my developer, should I count this roll as 1 'use' , or is the newly mixed developer now still as good as new ?!

Thankyou very much :D 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The developer contains reducing agents which are used up more by the air mixed in during development than by the contact with film. But depending on the formulation of the developer (enough sodiumsulfite that is) it can swallow quite an amount of oxygen from the mixed in air and you can use it to develop more than one film e.g. stock, undiluted (!) D75/ID11. Have a look into the data sheet for the developer and it will tell you how to handle this if it is possible. As far as I remember for D76 there is a 10% increase in time needed and you are fine. 

With C41 it should work too, with Tetenal 3 bath E6 it did afair, but refer to the manual and you will know. 

Edited by skahde
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On first principles, not from any special knowledge.........developer acts on the exposed light-sensitive chemicals. If they have not been exposed, then the developer should not be used up by them (though would be by contact with air as explained above). It's fixer that will be used up more than usual by unexposed film: fixer removes undeveloped light-sensitive chemicals.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if the message came through in my last post: It doesn't matter if the film in the tank was exposed or not. You could even forget to put film in the tank and should treat the developer as beeing used after shaking it a few minutes. 

Edited by skahde
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 7 Stunden schrieb Pyrogallol:

This needs a chemist to say whether the chemicals have been used up or not?

With a staining developer it's easy. Pour it out, look a the mess you got and you have your answer. Not saying they aren't nice developers, quite to the contrary! 👌

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, skahde said:

With a staining developer it's easy. Pour it out, look a the mess you got and you have your answer. Not saying they aren't nice developers, quite to the contrary! 👌

It's C41 processing, as in a kit of chemicals that have both a processing life and a shelf life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, skahde said:

You noticed the nickname of the individual I quoted, did you? 

I would never make an association between a nickname and the content of a post. I remember when ‘Mynobisbiggerthanyours’ got into an argument with ‘icanpisshigherthanyou’ and the outcome was very messy.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...