dem331 Posted February 17 Share #41 Posted February 17 Advertisement (gone after registration) 30 minutes ago, jaapv said: I'm not convinced that you used the same aperture. I don't know how I can show you the EFIX data. I actually used F2.2 on the 35mm and and f2.8 on the 180mm, but that only reinforces what I am saying. I just looked it up in LR (not for the Contax obviously) I really think that some of you guys, who actually know a lot more about optics and digital sensors than me, (and this is not false modesty), are so caught up in the "perspective only depends on where you are standing and is independent of focal length" mantra (which is a true mantra), that you fail to see that the different focal length changes things in the image that have nothing to do with perspective, and probably have something to do with that "widely misunderstood" concept of depth of field. I am happy to be disproved but I am not hearing any convincing argument. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.