Jump to content

How often do you use 'reduced' modes and why?


dpitt

Recommended Posts

Thanks for all of your tips and insights. It will be a while before I can buy a used M11. By then storage will even be cheaper. So it looks like I will go with the full resolution RAW most of the time, and maybe set the JPEGS as cropped  from time to time to preview my intended crop where needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am normally at 60, tempted oftent o go to 36 because theoretically that enhances dynamic range by a bit... ut then I look at my pictures and think, does it make a difference at my level?  However, I have had friends and 1 client wanting to print BIG.  Fortunatelly in all cases I had the 60m file.  Then again, I made plenty of money on a Canon with 18 mpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

First few months after owning it always shot at 36mpx, nice size file image and processing, since latest firmware and a reset to camera setting, i forget to set at M DNG, hence been shooting with L DNG, may be i might switch back to M, but i guess, so far no harms shooting L for the time being 

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 10 Stunden schrieb S Maclean:

I know I read somewhere that it did.  Something about how the pixels are grouped.

Yes, you could read it in several places, especially back when the M11 was brand-new. Yet it's just a myth. A common misconception—as everybody who actually has tried and compared the M11's various resolutions modes can confirm. That's why the voices who used to propagate that myth slowly fade away.

Edited by 01af
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 01af said:

Yes, you could read it in several places, especially back when the M11 was brand-new. Yet it's just a myth. A common misconception—as everybody who actually has tried and compared the M11's various resolutions modes can confirm. That's why the voices who used to propagate that myth slowly fade away.

Well, no wonder j was not noticing much difference! 😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, S Maclean said:

Well,  there you are then.  I know I read somewhere that it did.  Something about how the pixels are grouped.

Either way.  If the quality is the same, just larger...then go big!

It’s that if you output from your raw converter at the smaller resolutions you get the same results as doing it in camera. So any advantage is due to output not some special sauce in the camera.

And the differences are tiny, anyway.

Gordon

p.s.I use 18MP all the time. I see zero time when I want family photos at poster size.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get people will want to use 36mp or 18mp mode to hide the inevitable errors (e.g. camera shake, old lens defects and etc.). 
 

I personally would love to have 36mp for daily snaps but would stick with 60mp as I tend to set and forget. I’ve rareLY needed 60mp, but there is one occasion that I need to print out a heavily cropped 40mp image for home decor gave me res too low warning even with ai upscaling in PS. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...