Jump to content

New Leica M6 Film Camera


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

3 hours ago, logan2z said:

Still not sure I get the rationale behind re-releasing an M6 of any kind when the MP already exists.  What's the point?

About the same as the point for this.....

https://www.cameraquest.com/leicam6j.htm

1994 - M6 tarted up to (mostly) look like an M3 for the 40th anniversary of the M system (and M3). Even though the M6 and M3 "already existed." ;)

Also included the revival of the 50mm Elmar(-M) f/2.8 (previously mentioned here), and the creation of the .85x viewfinder - both of which became regular-production options for a decade or so.

Never underestimate the value of the "gotta keep my collection up to date or the other collectors win" and/or "gotta always have the newest thing" markets, when it comes to Leica. ;)

Also, there is some desire for the M4-through-M6/7's continuous-motion rapid-rewind crank, as opposed to the MP's grip-and-turn-and-grip-and-turn knob.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Huss said:

Someone is trying to sell a CM for almost $4k on fredmiranda.com.  Not even in ‘mint’ condition.  A new $2k CM type camera would do well.

It’s really amazing how Leica warps our ideas as to what is good value!

Gen Z buyers are changing the market for film cameras. Having grown up with a phone in hand and a camera always available, moving to film adds a challenge but not too much challenge. Cameras with meters sell well and bringing back a CM style camera would attract the buyers who are looking for a Contax T3. A rugged, water resistant composite body with matrix metering and a new version of the CL 40 mm for around two grand would fill that spot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, madNbad said:

Gen Z buyers are changing the market for film cameras. Having grown up with a phone in hand and a camera always available, moving to film adds a challenge but not too much challenge. Cameras with meters sell well and bringing back a CM style camera would attract the buyers who are looking for a Contax T3. A rugged, water resistant composite body with matrix metering and a new version of the CL 40 mm for around two grand would fill that spot.

I'd buy that.

Would I buy a tarted up limited edition M6 when I already have an MP?  Not unless my only interest was to flip it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, adan said:

Never underestimate the value of the "gotta keep my collection up to date or the other collectors win" and/or "gotta always have the newest thing" markets, when it comes to Leica. ;)

Indeed, I would add that a re-release m6  would be very similar to the re-release of the noktilux 50 1.2. 

From a practical point of view, where was the sense in that? Leica already sports the 50 0.95 nokti, the summilux, the apo, the cron. 

The point is that their brand is build on nostalgia, history, and tradition. By re-releasing old stuff, they emphasise this fact, while not creating competition to their current lineup.

Weather they offer an mp or an m6 doesn’t really matter, as long as it doesn’t compete with their digital bodies. A body with an electronic AE shutter and speeds up to 1/4000s would in a sense do this.

Regarding the new 1.2 nokti, their marketing also made it clear that it’s in a category of its own; a nostalgia piece that you want (need) to buy in addition to your existing fifties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, adan said:

About the same as the point for this.....

https://www.cameraquest.com/leicam6j.htm

1994 - M6 tarted up to (mostly) look like an M3 for the 40th anniversary of the M system (and M3). Even though the M6 and M3 "already existed." ;)

The difference there was that, in 1994, the M6 was the current model of Leica film camera.  Releasing an M6 special edition now would be like releasing a special edition of the M9 now - the camera has been superseded by newer/better models. 

Quote

Never underestimate the value of the "gotta keep my collection up to date or the other collectors win" and/or "gotta always have the newest thing" markets, when it comes to Leica. ;)

That could be it.  Maybe Leica will release an M6 LE with flare-prone finder, bubbly zinc top plate and a meter circuit for which no spare parts exist, just for old time's sake 😉

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

3 minutes ago, logan2z said:

That could be it.  Maybe Leica will release an M6 LE with bubbly zinc top plate just for old time's sake 😉

I would go for that as I have never seen an M6 with a bubbly zinc top nor do I know anyone who has. Of course I have seen pictures, but never the real thing. 🙂 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matlock said:

I would go for that as I have never seen an M6 with a bubbly zinc top nor do I know anyone who has. Of course I have seen pictures, but never the real thing. 🙂 

I had a M6 TTL that developed zinc oxidation. Fortunately for me, it happened at the peak of the 2008 recession combined with the great analog selling spree. I traded it and six hundred usd to KEH for an unused Millennium.

Several years later, after a lot of upgrades and plenty of use, the Millennium went to a new owner.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, logan2z said:

The difference there was that, in 1994, the M6 was the current model of Leica film camera.  Releasing an M6 special edition now would be like releasing a special edition of the M9 now - the camera has been superseded by newer/better models.

Not much difference - 95% of the MP is identical to the M6 (and vice versa). Put a canted rewind crank (and associated top plate with the correct shape) and a plastic-tipped advance lever on the MP (as Leica would do, for a price, in the "a la carte" era) and - presto, instant M6 (for all practical purposes). One could buy an M7 with MP knobs and levers on it.) All those are swappable parts - folks were finding old M2/M3 all-metal wind levers and getting them installed on their M4s through M6s for decades. And vice-versa.

The idea that Leica will reintroduce the M6 exactly, with its specific flaws, according to 1985 technology, is idiocy - it would cost MORE than simply using the current semi-mass-produced RF/VF and other parts of the MP/M-A, that Leica already makes.

Everything that Leica "reintroduces" is roughly akin to Volkswagen's "new Beetle" compared to the originals. Since lenses are simpler, and don't have to conform to updated road-safety laws, they are closer reproductions, but not in any way perfect copies. Glass types no longer exist, metal alloys are no longer generally available, the CNC milling machines at Uwe Weller are far different than the hand-operated machines at Leitz.

The "new" Noctilux f/1.2 uses molded ASPHs, not the hand-ground aspherics of 1966 (nor, for that matter, are the glass thicknesses or types exactly the same) - it is a re-designed "close approximation" of the original using 21st-century materials and techniques. And a "new" M6 would be the same. Maybe not milled brass, but not stamped zinc either.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, adan said:

Not much difference - 95% of the MP is identical to the M6 (and vice versa). Put a canted rewind crank (and associated top plate with the correct shape) and a plastic-tipped advance lever on the MP (as Leica would do, for a price, in the "a la carte" era) and - presto, instant M6 (for all practical purposes). One could buy an M7 with MP knobs and levers on it.) All those are swappable parts - folks were finding old M2/M3 all-metal wind levers and getting them installed on their M4s through M6s for decades. And vice-versa.

The idea that Leica will reintroduce the M6 exactly, with its specific flaws, according to 1985 technology, is idiocy - it would cost MORE than simply using the current semi-mass-produced RF/VF and other parts of the MP/M-A, that Leica already makes.

Everything that Leica "reintroduces" is roughly akin to Volkswagen's "new Beetle" compared to the originals. Since lenses are simpler, and don't have to conform to updated road-safety laws, they are closer reproductions, but not in any way perfect copies. Glass types no longer exist, metal alloys are no longer generally available, the CNC milling machines at Uwe Weller are far different than the hand-operated machines at Leitz.

The "new" Noctilux f/1.2 uses molded ASPHs, not the hand-ground aspherics of 1966 (nor, for that matter, are the glass thicknesses or types exactly the same) - it is a re-designed "close approximation" of the original using 21st-century materials and techniques. And a "new" M6 would be the same. Maybe not milled brass, but not stamped zinc either.

My expectation is exactly what you said. A M6 re-issue that is a set of cosmetic changes to the MP. Anything else would cost a small fortune in engineering time and tooling for what is a very niche product. I do hope it has a rewind crank instead of a knob. This is probably the bulk of the work to make an MP into a M6. No chance it will end up being a cheaper camera. 

 

 


 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, logan2z said:

Still not sure I get the rationale behind re-releasing an M6 of any kind when the MP already exists.  What's the point?

There is no rationale whatsoever, nor is there one with a totally back-to-the roots, stripped down to the core M-A hardly being able to become even more more basic and stripped down... But M6, being a cult classic, surely a re-release of any sorts in 2022 could be a huge hit, especially with that rewind crank...

Edited by Al Brown
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Al Brown said:

 But M6, being a cult classic, surely a re-release of any sorts in 2022 could be a huge hit, especially with that rewind crank...

So an M6 reissue will just be an MP with an M6 badge glued on and an angled rewind crank?  If that's enough for collectors to open their wallets then I guess that's good news for Leica. 

Edited by logan2z
Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, logan2z said:

So an M6 reissue will just be an MP with an M6 badge glued on and an angled rewind crank?  If that's enough for collectors to open their wallets then I guess that's good news for Leica. 

What do you expect or want it to be?

The MP is a M6 classic with improvements. I can’t imagine downgrading it would make collectors happy. 

Personally my dream is a MP with a larger diameter shutter dial with reversed direction. That would be a M6 TTL remake of sorts, but in a MP body. Clearly not going to happen so I’ll keep dreaming.

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Crem said:

The MP is a M6 classic with improvements.

That's exactly what I've been saying.  So, at the risk of repeating myself, I don't see the point in making a big fuss about shipping the same camera but calling it an M6.  That said, if that excites Leica collectors and it makes Leica a chunk of money, then I'm all for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the angled crank Ms and wished the M-A had it also. I think it would have given it better differentiation from the MP. If this rumoured new film camera is indeed an M, I hope it would be an angled crank and somehow much lighter in weight than current Ms. Maybe they can use unobtainium as a choice material.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, logan2z said:

That's exactly what I've been saying.  So, at the risk of repeating myself, I don't see the point in making a big fuss about shipping the same camera but calling it an M6.  That said, if that excites Leica collectors and it makes Leica a chunk of money, then I'm all for it.

Makes sense. I can agree with you I’m happy it makes Leica a big chunk of cash. I do see one side benefit. The more MPs they sell including special editions… the longer they will keep making parts for my MP. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2022 at 9:41 AM, logan2z said:

Releasing an M6 special edition now would be like releasing a special edition of the M9 now - the camera has been superseded by newer/better models.

mmm… not that long ago there was a limited release of refurbished M9s sold out pretty quickly. “Better” is often the result of a compromise and some users prefer uncompromised. And don’t underestimate the power of nostalgia!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am 11.9.2022 um 01:55 schrieb logan2z:

Still not sure I get the rationale behind re-releasing an M6 of any kind when the MP already exists.  What's the point?

What was the reason for re- releasing the MP in 2003 when the M6 and M6 TTl have already existed? To bring back the knurled knob for film rewinding? What was the point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...