Shawn30 Posted July 13, 2022 Share #21 Posted July 13, 2022 Advertisement (gone after registration) 13 hours ago, MJB said: Really? I think the CL has excellent high ISO performance. <shrug> I'm not complaining. In order to replace my CL that I'm perfectly happy with, Leica would have to make the replacement better than what I have. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 13, 2022 Posted July 13, 2022 Hi Shawn30, Take a look here ASSUMPTION: What improvements would you ask for in CL and TL2?.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
MJB Posted July 13, 2022 Share #22 Posted July 13, 2022 45 minutes ago, Shawn30 said: I'm not complaining. In order to replace my CL that I'm perfectly happy with, Leica would have to make the replacement better than what I have. Ah, understood. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Prime Posted July 14, 2022 Share #23 Posted July 14, 2022 (edited) When I had a CL for a brief time there really wasn’t anything I thought was missing. I would have liked it to have had a more traditional shutter speed wheel so that I could use it with my M glass like a mini travel M but it was already good when used in Aperture priority mode….but I got a bit frustrated with the controls trying to figure out how best to use it with my M glass and after reading rumours of a CL-2 I sold it, virtually as new, and waited for the new CL-2 product announcement…….. oops! The silver lining is that without a digital camera this past year or so I’ve spent more time developing my skills with film in an M3 and M4. I would put my priority on the quality of the EVF, it’s resolution, image quality and manual focus aids. Edited July 14, 2022 by Mr.Prime Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.