Jump to content

Maximum aperture in video C4k full frame mode? 1.7 with a 1.4 lens?


bpLeica

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, frame-it said:

at minimum focus distance?

Focusi distance doesn’t change anything. Basically in video mode maximum aperture is limited to 1.7 on the 50/1.4 and 3.2 om]n the 24-90 @28mm

Edited by bpLeica
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. T stop vs F stop might be the reason, as in "proper" filmmaking cinematographers think in T stops, which take the ND factor of the lens‘ glass in account. Depending on the lens design, a f 1,4 lens can be a t 1,7 lens (which is at the "dark" end of the T vs F delta). 
 

All that is moot of course, if your lens cannot open up fully in terms of physical aperture and not nomenclature. If that’s the case, there might be a technical reason, which I‘d like to know.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bpLeica said:

Folks I just realized that my SL 50/1.4 cannot be set to less than 1.7 when shooting MOV video in C4k... ditto with 24-90?? is this normal or my settings are wrong?

Its the "T" rating of the lens, available since the last update. The number can seem heartbreaking with our beloved 24/90 where the "geometrical" F2.8-4 aperture becomes a T3.2-4.5.

 

The f-number ("relative aperture"), N, is defined by N = f/EN, where f is the focal length and EN is the diameter of the entrance pupil (rather than the actual aperture system inside the lens).

"T" standing for "Transmission" (of light) of light rays accross the whole frame covered by the image lens circle. Put simply, you substract the vignetting from your theoretical "F" number to get an idea of how much light the lens is able to transmit from the front element AKA entrance pupil back at the rear exit onto your sensitive surface. You can calculate it by dividing the f-stop of the lens by the square root of light transmittance. So, let's suppose we have a lens with a maximum aperture of 2.8, and 90% of the light goes through. We divide 2.8 by √0.90. The resulting value is 2.953, which we can round up to T/3.0



The more reflections you can observe by looking the front element of a lens, the more light that is reflected back out and that won't make its way down the lens.

Summicron SL are said by DXO test to be T2.0 lenses, which suggest that their actual F number in design would be closer to a F1.8 than F2.0. I havent seen what Leica rating for that is, all one has to do is try it on their SL2(s) with latest software.



 

Edited by Slender
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Slender said:

Its the "T" rating of the lens, available since the last update. The number can seem heartbreaking with our beloved 24/90 where the "geometrical" F2.8-4 aperture becomes a T3.2-4.5.

 

The f-number ("relative aperture"), N, is defined by N = f/EN, where f is the focal length and EN is the diameter of the entrance pupil (rather than the actual aperture system inside the lens).

"T" standing for "Transmission" (of light) of light rays accross the whole frame covered by the image lens circle. Put simply, you substract the vignetting from your theoretical "F" number to get an idea of how much light the lens is able to transmit from the front element AKA entrance pupil back at the rear exit onto your sensitive surface. You can calculate it by dividing the f-stop of the lens by the square root of light transmittance. So, let's suppose we have a lens with a maximum aperture of 2.8, and 90% of the light goes through. We divide 2.8 by √0.90. The resulting value is 2.953, which we can round up to T/3.0



The more reflections you can observe by looking the front element of a lens, the more light that is reflected back out and that won't make its way down the lens.

Summicron SL are said by DXO test to be T2.0 lenses, which suggest that their actual F number in design would be closer to a F1.8 than F2.0. I havent seen what Leica rating for that is, all one has to do is try it on their SL2(s) with latest software.



 

Thank you this clears it up. I didn’t notice in the FW update notes about this change which is good when shooting video.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, bpLeica said:

Thank you this clears it up. I didn’t notice in the FW update notes about this change which is good when shooting video.

It was promised from launch, and then quietly forgotten for a while. The more lens elements the better the quality of the optic, but yeah it becomes harder to channel of the "perfected" light rays through so many layers of glass and air (18 elements in 24/90.... and like 23 from memory? in 90-280)

Edited by Slender
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...