Jump to content

best sd card for m10 monochrom?


kcnarf1

Recommended Posts

I' use this one for my Q2M (47MP) w/o any problem. They are reliable, fast enough, and not expensive as the 300MB/s. You can't go wrong.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Dennis
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Dennis said:

I' use this one for my Q2M (47MP) w/o any problem. They are reliable, fast enough, and not expensive as the 300MB/s. You can't go wrong.

It works but the camera is only UHS-I and won’t work at that speed. 
 

the Leica Q2 works with UHS-II, but not the M. the only M that works with UHS-II is the Leica M11. The card works on the M10 but only at UHS-I speeds  

 

21 hours ago, kcnarf1 said:

Thanks, Dennis. I'll check it out.

 

Don’t buy UHS-II cards. The camera can’t use those speeds. 

just get normal Sandisk Extreme Pro cards. 64/128/256. Whatever. UHS-I is the fastest card the camera will work with. Anything else is a waste of money.  

save yourself $20 bucks and get the Sandisk. 

Edited by KeyofG
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KeyofG said:

It works but the camera is only UHS-I and won’t work at that speed. 
 

the Leica Q2 works with UHS-II, but not the M. the only M that works with UHS-II is the Leica M11. The card works on the M10 but only at UHS-I speeds  

 

Don’t buy UHS-II cards. The camera can’t use those speeds. 

just get normal Sandisk Extreme Pro cards. 64/128/256. Whatever. UHS-I is the fastest card the camera will work with. Anything else is a waste of money.  

save yourself $20 bucks and get the Sandisk. 

I agree with you! It's correct: the M10M doesn't read the UHS-II. But the price is very affordable, it's something between expensive UHS-II and UHS-I, and it's a card that can be used with Q2, M11, SL2, etc. I think it is worth the $20 extra bucks. The UHS-I doesn't have much future. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, Dennis said:

But the price is very affordable, it's something between expensive UHS-II and UHS-I, and it's a card that can be used with Q2, M11, SL2, etc. I think it is worth the $20 extra bucks. The UHS-I doesn't have much future. 

If you have all those other cameras then of course you’ll use your UHS-II cards. But the maximum write speed difference between the Sandisk (90MB/s) and the Lexar (120MB/s) is negligible since we shoot leica and not Sony spraying 30 frames per second. Both cards will clear the buffer the same (otherwise the faster ones are $140.00 Lexar vs $30.00 Sandisk).
 

Also the operating temperature of the Sandisk card is a lot better (Sandisk goes from  -13 to 185°F [-25 to 85°C],  while the Lexar goes from 32 to 158°F [0 to 70°C]), which IMO counts for a lot more since you’re not getting any performance benefits.

If you don’t have any cameras that use UHS-II then there’s no point getting one. And if you DO have the ones that use UHS-II then you’ll be getting the fast expensive ones not the cheaper ones that pretty much work like a UHS-I card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

. . .  while the iMac has an SDXC card slot , only recently Apple supports UHS-II:  Mac Studio  2022, MacBook Pro   2021, iMac &  iMac Pro 2020 .

So if you want to read fast, you need an external card reader.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Any issues (I wouldn't think so) on using the above referenced cards on a M-P 240? "SanDisk 128GB Extreme PRO UHS-I SDXC  or SanDisk 64GB Extreme PRO"

And what about a card reader for a Mac Book Pro (thunderbolt/USB4)? I haven't yet searched the forum on a card reader recommendation but figured I would ask here. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...