Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Overgaard said:

Time to decide for processing route. Now that final profiles are ready, I made a comparison. I'll be doing a 16-bit TIFF print for myself and tell about it in a video or article later. 

My personal take at this stage is Capture One M11 profile. I also like the Film Shadow edition because it's muted and old school. In Lightroom I would go with he Default. Many details to look at; the textures, the ting of blue or lack thereof, how alive the surfaces look ... and more. I think you can click on it and see it larger. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Thorsten,

Thanks for posting these.  My eyes detect no difference between the Capture One Default and the Capture One M11 Neutral.   Are you seeing a difference in the two?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, relms said:

Thorsten,

Thanks for posting these.  My eyes detect no difference between the Capture One Default and the Capture One M11 Neutral.   Are you seeing a difference in the two?

They're close. Though, look at the bokeh and color of the bokeh. I'll show other comparisons later, with skin tones and natural daylight colors.

There is less shadow int he corners of the M11 profile (more shadow details), and other rather strange differences as the mirror where suddenly, with the M11 Profile, there is a reflcetion of details. When I saw it first, I thought it was two different files and something had reflected light onto the mirror in the second one. But no, it's the profile.

However, if one use Capture One, the profile is given, so no reason to worry, and the tests shows that the M11 Profile is an improvement. In Lightroom you have a choice, and there is a big difference. 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand from David Farkas in yesterday’s Red Dot Forum 2nd stream on the M11 that Adobe does not yet officially supports the M11 with a profile. They commented that while there is a profile labelled M11, it is embedded with the file and comes from the camera. They recommended using the default profile as per Thorsten’s preference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I look through the Library of Profiles for Adobe on my hard drive, I do not find an M11 .dcp (digital camera profile) file yet.  It is nice that .dng includes an embedded profile.  The last update of Adobe photo software was January 19.  (In contrast, the Nikon Z9 .dcp was there in December before the production cameras started shipping.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't find it on my hard drive either, but it is there somewhere!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

(It was definitely included in the dec 2021 release of dng converter)

I took it apart and (I'm not saying that adobe won't tweak it, but) it looks like a fully functioning finished adobe dcp file to me (contains CM/FM/HSD/LUT data just like all the other dcp files this side of about 2008 !!!)

(FYI note that 'adobe color' is a generic 3DLUT file that's not specific to any camera, literally it's the same file that get used again and again)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...