Leica M11 Review by Jono Slack

[eab]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 minutes ago, Tailwagger said:

I received my camera this evening and truly my first impression is one of astonishment.  I've shot all my Ms with an RRS which somewhat brings the M up to adult size as a camera. It's been a while since I've actually held an M without one. Forget about everything else, cost, shutter sound, whatever little or big niggle has you annoyed.  That a camera this small and light... yeah I had to take black... packs this much of a punch is simply unbelievable. When you factor in that some 20% of the camera is taken up by the rangefinder and another 20% or so for the battery, it is simply magic. I know some folks are disappointed by this or that, but I mean, my god, just look at this thing. I know the form factor hasn't changed, but dang there's 64gb, BSI, 60Mpx, 2x or more the battery life... and in retrospect, I'm nearly as astonished by the 10-R.  Grab a cup of evening tea, find a quiet spot, turn the lights down, mount a 'cron and lay the thing on the table.  Zen moment.   

I've only made a test shot or two so and while I'm very encouraged, its certainly possible any number of disappointments will surface over the next couple of days. That said, if I had one wish for the M11, it'd be that my Hasselblad loving/Leica hating father was still alive to hold and shoot with this thing. It really is mind blowing. I'm sure even a Leica hater like him would have loved it. 

I am with you on this, small, light, but powerful.  Sometimes I pick up my iPhone and have similar thoughts.  I got into computing when 4bit processors were available to hobbyists and once in a while when I look at an iPhone I think to myself how far we have come.....

[Tailwagger]

8 minutes ago, davidvanchu said:

Thankfully Porsche brought back the NA 6 cylinder, maybe Leica will do the same

But retained the turbo, which with the slightest of tunes will give GT4 a run for its money.  No need to argue, it will be an EV soon enough and then we all can be pissed. 😃

Edited January 15, 2022 by Tailwagger

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[Stevejack]

5 minutes ago, Tailwagger said:

I received my camera this evening and truly my first impression is one of astonishment.  I've shot all my Ms with an RRS which somewhat brings the M up to adult size as a camera. It's been a while since I've actually held an M without one. Forget about everything else, cost, shutter sound, whatever little or big niggle has you annoyed.  That a camera this small and light... yeah I had to take black... packs this much of a punch is simply unbelievable. When you factor in that some 20% of the camera is taken up by the rangefinder and another 20% or so for the battery, it is simply magic. I know some folks are disappointed by this or that, but I mean, my god, just look at this thing. I know the form factor hasn't changed, but dang there's 64gb, BSI, 60Mpx, 2x or more the battery life... and in retrospect, I'm nearly as astonished by the 10-R.  Grab a cup of evening tea, find a quiet spot, turn the lights down, mount a 'cron and lay the thing on the table.  Zen moment.   

I've only made a test shot or two so and while I'm very encouraged, its certainly possible any number of disappointments will surface over the next couple of days. That said, if I had one wish for the M11, it'd be that my Hasselblad loving/Leica hating father was still alive to hold and shoot with this thing. It really is mind blowing. I'm sure even a Leica hater like him would have loved it. 

Any possible future disappointments aside, you're already in love - and love is truly blind!  I'm sure you'll get along great despite any niggles, and I look forward to seeing your photographs in the M11 image thread when you get a chance to head out for a play.   Enjoy!

[Tailwagger]

1 minute ago, eab said:

I am with you on this, small, light, but powerful.  Sometimes I pick up my iPhone and have similar thoughts.  I got into computing when 4bit processors were available to hobbyists and once in a while when I look at an iPhone I think to myself how far we have come.....

Ah for a good slice of bits... 😉  The things we used to do in 16K.  It is amazing how far we've come in the last half century, but equally a little frightening that so few appreciate it. 

[vedivv]

Hi Jono, could you comment on the RF focus accuracy? 

Zooming in  your shots (great pics), I noticed that many seemed to be slightly out of focus.  I also looked at the photos Chris took at DPReview, which looked much sharper and in focus.  I am guessing the difference has to do with the fact you focused with optical finder while Chris focused on the LCD. 
 

[ravinj]

6 minutes ago, Tailwagger said:

I received my camera this evening and truly my first impression is one of astonishment.  I've shot all my Ms with an RRS which somewhat brings the M up to adult size as a camera. It's been a while since I've actually held an M without one. Forget about everything else, cost, shutter sound, whatever little or big niggle has you annoyed.  That a camera this small and light... yeah I had to take black... packs this much of a punch is simply unbelievable. When you factor in that some 20% of the camera is taken up by the rangefinder and another 20% or so for the battery, it is simply magic. I know some folks are disappointed by this or that, but I mean, my god, just look at this thing. I know the form factor hasn't changed, but dang there's 64gb, BSI, 60Mpx, 2x or more the battery life... and in retrospect, I'm nearly as astonished by the 10-R.  Grab a cup of evening tea, find a quiet spot, turn the lights down, mount a 'cron and lay the thing on the table.  Zen moment.   

I've only made a test shot or two so and while I'm very encouraged, its certainly possible any number of disappointments will surface over the next couple of days. That said, if I had one wish for the M11, it'd be that my Hasselblad loving/Leica hating father was still alive to hold and shoot with this thing. It really is mind blowing. I'm sure even a Leica hater like him would have loved it. 

Great points. What I also find impressive is all of this is done with the same M mount supporting lenses from decades ago without adapters. I can't think of any other manufacturer accomplishing this feat.

[tightsqueez]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

3 hours ago, trickness said:

I think the removal of the bottom plate is akin to the switch in the 911 from an air to a liquid cooled motor - sacrilege to the faithful but a necessary improvement. Or perhaps that analogy is better attributed to the significance of the switch from analog to digital M’s???? 

Yeah, air to liquid is like when like Leica went digital. The RMS issue with the 996 was the IR issue of the M8. I had a 996 for three years as my daily driver and loved it! The new ones don’t look like they could be thrashed like the smaller iterations. 

[tightsqueez]

40 minutes ago, Tailwagger said:

But retained the turbo, which with the slightest of tunes will give GT4 a run for its money.  No need to argue, it will be an EV soon enough and then we all can be pissed. 😃

Where is that EV lag in an M?? I’ll take two doses of that! 

[tightsqueez]

15 minutes ago, ravinj said:

Great points. What I also find impressive is all of this is done with the same M mount supporting lenses from decades ago without adapters. I can't think of any other manufacturer accomplishing this feat.

I agree. And that’s pretty awesome. Thank you Leica. 

[ramarren]

8 hours ago, trickness said:

The analogy has got nothing to do with pricing.

It's a reference to a manufacturer (Porsche, and Leica) respecting the lineage of a product, incrementally improving it over time, without losing sight of the essence and history of the product. It's a fine line as you have to both listen to and ignore the desires of your customers, who may think they know what's the best way forward, and quite often, don't.

The 911 and the M are unique siblings in this regard.

(The Lancia Fulvia hasn't been manufactured since 1976 by the way).

 

Mine is the last year manufactured by Lancia before the company was bought by FIAT, a 1967. But what does it matter that they haven't been manufactured since 1976? Beautiful, classic, timeless design remains viable long after production has ended and the company is gone.   

G

[Tailwagger]

52 minutes ago, Stevejack said:

Any possible future disappointments aside, you're already in love - and love is truly blind!  I'm sure you'll get along great despite any niggles, and I look forward to seeing your photographs in the M11 image thread when you get a chance to head out for a play.   Enjoy!

It's more infatuation at the moment. True love takes some time; building a relationship through the highs and lows of the day to day grind. 😉

I'm sure there's going to be a learning curve, but if I do manage anything worthwhile in the next few days, I'll put them up.  The few BS shots I've done with the '69 lux so far have me really intrigued. I was never quite as fond of my earlier lenses on the 10-R as I was on the previous two cameras. I have to do some testing, but I've never seen this lens look this good, and in the corners as well. First impression is that indeed vignetting does seem to be reduced significantly. And, as predicted by those in the know, it stands up to 60Mpx. Its hard to convey, but this was shot 1/40" with the 'lux at f2.8. Focus point was on the lens release. No motion blur, sharp as a tack at the point of focus if you were to see the original... its sad that the on page stuff fails to convey this, but what can you do. Clicking through should hopefully give a better impression. I expect there'll be plenty of APO shots to pour over, so perhaps I'll spend more time with the earlier glass to back fill the samples provided by others as I'm sure that will be a topic of interest for some. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Should mention that the shot was imported into LR and screen shot as is, no adjustments. 

Edited January 15, 2022 by Tailwagger

[jakontil]

9 hours ago, derleicaman said:

In my short experience with the M11 (one week) I did notice that when the camera is switched on and you change lenses, the sensor is exposed. I believe this was not in Live View mode, just normal camera switched on mode. When the camera is turned off, the sensor is covered for lens changes. I know it is bad practice to change lenses with the M10 with the camera switched on. The sensor, even though covered, attracts more dust while switched on I am told. I tried to get an image of the area in the camera where the meter used to be, but being black on black, not too successful. The area in the shutter box is much like the pre-M6 cameras, and looks rather naked compared to the M8 through M10 camera generations.

Here is a picture of it.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

i concur swapping lens in mode on attracts dust as static occurs despite previous M seem covered

[trickness]

33 minutes ago, ramarren said:

Mine is the last year manufactured by Lancia before the company was bought by FIAT, a 1967. But what does it matter that they haven't been manufactured since 1976? Beautiful, classic, timeless design remains viable long after production has ended and the company is gone.   

G

Nice! But in terms of the analogy I was making - the Lancia was produced for just about 10 years and was gone, unlike the 911 which has a lineage which goes back almost to the dawn of Porsche and has improved over many iterations, which is why I think it is more appropriate to compare the 911 (than the Lancia) to the M.

[Tailwagger]

49 minutes ago, tightsqueez said:

Where is that EV lag in an M?? I’ll take two doses of that! 

No lag in the S or the earlier GTS with the twin vane.  Base 2.0L sure.  Ever driven a '76 911 turbo? If not, you don't know the meaning of the word lag.  I sold my Cayman '17 S last spring, but still have two earlier 911s laying around somewhere.

[ramarren]

4 hours ago, trickness said:

Nice! But in terms of the analogy I was making - the Lancia was produced for just about 10 years and was gone, unlike the 911 which has a lineage which goes back almost to the dawn of Porsche and has improved over many iterations, which is why I think it is more appropriate to compare the 911 (than the Lancia) to the M.

Well, I wasn't comparing a Lancia Fulvia to a Leica M. I was replying to the note that suggested that people who could afford a Porsche 911 could likely afford a Leica M ... And intimating that while anyone who can afford the luxury of a classic specialty car *could* likely afford a Leica M, well, competing desires against some limit on the resources, and all that. 

I was not responding to your philosophical/aesthetic notion of Leica M and Porsche 911 being some kind of "of a kind" products.

I never particularly liked 911s myself ... My uncle had a '71: it was a rattly noisy thing; my buddies are nutty about their newer and far far better ones. Quirky but good cars, racing heritage and all that. But they simply don't appeal to me. 

Leicas do appeal to me. They work, they're good, solid cameras and always have been ... not quirky things. 

A Porsche 550 Spyder or 904 Carrera .. .yeah, I'll take one of those. Those are the only Porsches I've ever gotten hot for. Almost had a 550 Spyder once, but the deal didn't happen. Oh well. 

Ten years is a good long run for a car model. The fact that the Fulvia Coupe survived for nine years after the company that designed it went under and was bought out by a conglomerate corporate entity does speak volumes for a timeless design that endured well despite the vicissitudes of business and time. The fact that it still looks crisp, fresh, and modern today, and can keep up with and be usable in modern traffic, does the same. 

My 1978 Leica M4-2 is my only Leica M at present, and it's just fine. The M-D 262 was the closest thing to it in a Leica digital M that's been made, and I probably should not have sold it. But eh, so it goes.

G

Edited January 15, 2022 by ramarren

[FrankX]

Anyone knows if the black color on aluminum is the same quality/type used for the SL2? Quick answer appreciated!

Trying to sort whether to buy a black or a silver M11. Currently, I have a silver M10 - mostly bought since I thought it would be more robust. The silver looks quite mint after 5 years. However, I have also a SL2 for almost 2 years now without any scratches so far. 

I like the black M11 with the new black Visoflex 2 way more 😍, but the demo camera in the store seemed to have already a small "scratch"... (still black, but a little bit more shiny). 😮

Edited January 15, 2022 by FrankX

[rfunnell]

Nicely done as usual Jono and here I was thinking I didn't need one. 

Have been enjoying my experience with the Sl2-S and almost all the Leica lenses created for it over the past 3 years.

I wouldn't mind an M11 and just one lens when I feel like travelling light not that there has been much travelling lately but I'm always hopeful.

You have taken some great images there   ,     kind regards  Ross

[Kim Dahl]

On 1/13/2022 at 3:00 PM, jonoslack said:

Introduction

The Leica M10 was announced on January 17th 2017, 4 days short of 5 years ago.

I was in Wetzlar for the launch, which was a wonderful affair, first of all we were wined and dined and then, after the presentation the store was opened and you could go and buy your own camera, I know several people who were so excited that they bought both a chrome and a black camera!

The M10 has been a sparkling success, with lots of variants over the last 5 years including the M10 Monochrom, the M10-D without a display screen the M10-P with a touch screen and quieter shutter, culminating in the M10-R with the improved 40mp sensor.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I think that lots of people have been feeling that the M10-R is really the ultimate M, with a wonderful sensor, quiet and subtle shutter noise, the size of the M3 and a refined and accurate rangefinder. I must say, having been using the M10-R since July 2019 I was very much feeling that nothing else was needed.

So how can Leica convince us that anything else is needed? Indeed, is anything else needed? I'm going to try and answer these questions during the course of this article.

I've been watching all the speculation (and leaks) about the M11, and people's responses to this has been very helpful in deciding what to write about in the article. I realise that my personal concerns aren't the same as everybody else's so it's been valuable to get a handle on what other people mind about.

I'm hoping that this will be a useful resource to anyone who is about to receive their new camera (or has just received it).

Lets start by looking at what Leica have changed with the M11 (and there is a lot!).

Hardware

The Body

Superficially the M11 looks very much like the M10, the dimensions are identical and everything appears to be in the same place. However a closer examination shows a lot of differences.

First of all, there is no base plate. This is quite an emotional issue for lots of M users (myself included). Removing the base plate to replace the battery or get at the SD card slot could be bit of a pain, but it was also different from any other modern camera and more often rather a pleasure.

Of course it also represented continuity with the very early days of Leica film cameras.

The base of the M11 holds a battery (and battery release switch which is the same design as that on the SL2 and Q2 cameras). The battery however is different. More about that later.

New Button layout

Just like the M10 the M11 has 3 buttons to the left of the LCD, but unlike the Live View / Play / Menu options on the M10 they have been changed to Play / Fn / Menu options like the SL2, The Fn key defaults to turning on and off Live View, but it can be configured to any other function as desired.

The rear plate has been tidied up a bit - the buttons are now separate from the LCD, and the LCD is flush with the top plate and base of the camera.

The front configureable button on the M10 has gone, but there is a new button on the top plate (in the position of the Video button on the M(240). Like the Fn (above) this button can be configured to default to any particular menu option (I have it set to magnification like the old front button on the M10).

The third function button is accessed by a press of the rear thumbwheel: A short press of either of the Fn buttons will bring up the last selected menu option. A long press brings up the menu of available menu options, if you choose this, then it will be used as the default next time. The thumbwheel itself can be set either to Focus Assist, or to Exposure compensation.

The 4 way rocker switch hasn't changed, but now it is only used for navigation and confirmation. Pressing the central button doesn't bring up the status screen as it did in the M10 as all the status information is now included on the Quick Menu screen.

To summarise, there are now 3 function buttons, each of which can be configured as desired and the thumbwheel can be used in the same way as the M10. I'll go into the Menu options in more detail later on.

The Finish

Apparently the Black Chrome process has become un-ecological to continue with. So the new M11 comes with two finishes:

First of all a traditional Silver Chrome with a brass top plate, as before.

Secondly a Black Paint finish with an aluminium top plate. The new black paint is a modern solution and kinder to the environment.

The camera is also a bit lighter than the chrome version (530gm vs 640gm) and with a seriously tough finish (and I know, mine's had a really hard time),

After 7 months and trips to sandy beaches in Crete and in rainstorms in the UK, the finish only shows signs of being slightly shiny on the corners (with the same treatment the SL2 and my Q2 Mono looked decidedly worn, with worn corners and lots of bright points). I've been using a shoulder strap which rubs against the camera all the time (with no protector) and there is little sign of wear on the paint above the strap lugs. What's more the black finish is more 'grippy' than either the chrome or the old black finishes.

As I understand it the finish is the same as the 'reporter' editions of the M10 and Q2, except that it's black rather than green.

New Battery

One of the obvious shortcomings of the M10 was the battery life, especially when using the EVF. The new battery for the M11 is properly weather-sealed and fits into the base of the camera in the same way as the Q2 and SL2 battery (with a similar latch mechanism).

It would have been good if the new camera used the same battery as the Q/SL, but in that case they would have had to have a new compartment to hold the SD card, and as always with the M cameras space is at a premium.

So the new battery leaves room for an SD card slot on one side of it, the only downside is that the release lever is obscured when the camera is mounted on a tripod, it would have been nicer if you could change battery/card without having to take the camera off the tripod. On the other hand, with the greatly improved battery life and the internal memory perhaps that isn't quite so relevant.

The battery life is a really much better (CIPA suggests 700 images per charge), On occasions I've used 3 batteries in a day with the M10, but on the M11 I've not ever exhausted a battery in a day's shooting, even with the power saving switched off, and using the EVF full time.

64Gb high speed internal memory

The internal memory is an alternative to two SD card slots (and presumably takes up less space).

If, like me, you are prone to grab a dog and a camera and head out into the world, only to find that you left your SD card in your computer, then the internal memory is a real bonus. The only downside is that you have to connect to the camera via the USB cable to get files from it, either that or else copy files from the Internal memory to an SD card (which is simple and works well).

You can choose various ways to handle the INT storage together with an SD card; Currently:

• SD first (uses SD until full then INT)
• Backup (writes files to both together)
• Split (DNG on INT jpg on SD)
• SD Only
• INT first (uses INT until full then SD)

What's missing is the other Split:

• Split (jpg on INT, DNG on SD)

I would find this very useful for event shooting; using FOTOS for quick access to social media with the jpg files, which would also serve as a backup to the DNG files which would be put on the computer later via the SD card. It's been requested, and I'm hopeful that it'll turn up on the next firmware update.

The internal memory is extremely fast. In my tests it is slightly faster than a SanDisk 128Gb Extreme Pro 300mb/s UHS-II SDXC for short bursts and about 20% faster for extended shooting.

High Speed Shooting and the Buffer

The camera also has a 3Gb buffer, which is enough for 15 DNG images and as many as 100 JPG images. There are two high speed shooting modes, one at 3 frames per second and the other at 4.5

New Maestro processor

The M11 has the Maestro III processor which is used in the SL2 and the Q2 to allow much faster processing and better power consumption. To be fair, I never found the M10 to be slow, and the M11 doesn't feel very much faster.

New 60mp Sensor & Image Quality

The M11 has a new 60mp BSI CMOS sensor. The base ISO is 64, so that's an improvement as well. The DNG files from the M11 are a joy to work with in Lightroom.

High ISO is about 1.5 stops better than the M10-R (which is still very good), but there is generally more detail available as the resolution is higher. I'm happy to shoot at ISO 5000, and 6400 is very usable and 12500, whilst losing some detail still has good colour.

The M11 also shows noticeably less vignetting than the M10-R whilst the excellent colour feels more 'realistic' (although perhaps not so charming). Skin tones are excellent, in my opinion better than any previous M camera. I'm not a fan of Auto White Balance in daylight, but as a result of literally thousands of image samples being sent in to Leica during the testing period this works very well (in artificial light too)

The dynamic range seems to be very good (but I don't really have a way of measuring it); it is at least as good as the M10-R and probably a little better, although I found it very slightly easier to blow highlights than with the M10-R (the M11 is still much better than the 24mp M1o).

The amount of detail at 60mp is quite startling and suitable for very big prints.

Full Time off Sensor Metering

All previous M cameras with built in metering (with the exception of the M5) have metered off the shutter curtain. The M240 and M10 also metered off the sensor in Live View.

The M11 has dispensed with this, and now metering is only via the sensor, this has the advantage that the metering is much more accurate (with multi-point, centre weighted and spot metering options).

Live View metering is inherently slower as it means that the shutter must be open to take the reading and then shut and re-open to make the exposure: With the M240 and the M10 metering was much slower than with Live View switched off (and metering off the shutter curtain), this isn't the case with the M11, but I'll deal with responsiveness later on.

Electronic shutter

With the M11, like the SL2, you can choose

• Mechanical
• Hybrid
• Electronic shutter

With the mechanical shutter you have the same limit of 1/4000th as the M10, Hybrid uses the electronic shutter when the speed required is over 1/4000, Electronic uses electronic shutter at all speeds. The Electronic shutter goes up to 1/16000.

The electronic shutter is fantastic for using fast lenses in bright light, but not for capturing sports or fast moving action. The readout on the electronic shutter takes about 1/10th second (CMOS sensors read line by line). This means that if objects are moving fast through the frame then you get tilted verticals and you may also get banding in artificial light,(depending on the shutter speed and the light source,) but for static or slow movement when you want to shoot wide open in bright light it's a real asset. These issues are found in many cameras which have progressive electronic shutters.

Worth noting that if you have set the camera to electronic shutter and you want to select shutter speeds above 1/4000th then you need to set the shutter speed dial to B, and you can then select the desired shutter speed in the menu.

USB - C

The Camera has a USB-C connector on the base at the extreme right (looking from the back). Not such a big deal you might think, but actually this is a real game changer. I'm going to discuss this at length later on in the article, (in Cables and Compatibility, and also in the FOTOS section).

Enough now to say that it works really well for charging the camera (and quickly), and also for connectivity to computer / tablet / phone. There is no cover for it (just as there isn't in most modern phones), but it is weather sealed and dust doesn't seem to be a problem.

To connect to an iOS device with a lightning port you'll need Leica's special MFI compliant cable. To connect to most other devices a USB-c to USB-c cable works fine although I found difficulty connecting with an Apple USB-C thunderbolt 3 cable, all USB-C cables are not made the same! My feeling is that the M11 is less fussy than some of the other devices I've tried to attach.

The New External EVF

The new EVF is a 3.7Mp OLED display, which sounds very much like that in the Q2 and certainly it feels that good.

It's very nicely made out of metal, tilt-able, with magnets to stop it tilting when you don't want it to! It has clear and useful detents at 45 and 90 degrees.

It suits the camera really well, flush with the body at the front, and although it's bulky, it's not as tall as the previous EVF, which means it fits better in your bag. The hot shoe connection is much more positive as well, making it less likely to fall off - mind you, a lock would have been nice!

There is still some 'black out' after shooting, and so it isn't quite so good for continuous shooting as the Q2.

Comparing it to the previous EVF on my M10-R the image seems larger and brighter and more detailed.

In this case the proof is in the use. With my M10 I almost never used the EVF, but with the M11 I've used it extensively. I think those who are lucky enough to have Noctiluxes will be very happy with it as well!

The new EVF will also work with all M10 variants, there will be a firmware update to enable this function which is due in March 2022.

Firmware

Variable Sized DNG Files

This is an interesting idea, and I'm not aware of any other company doing the same thing. This is not a crop, it's a full frame image, but with a lower Megapixel count - with either 60, 36 or 18mp. They use Pixel Binning to achieve this.

3 different sizes 60mp 9504 x 6320 36mp 7416 x 4928 18mp 5272 x 3498

I've done some pretty careful test comparisons of the different image sizes, and although there is an improvement in noise levels with the lower pixel counts (as you might hope for), reducing a 60mp image in Post Processing software has a similar effect.

On the other hand I'm always reading about people who don't want the increased storage space of higher Mp files, and this gives you the best of both worlds in that you have the opportunity of more pixels, but you can shoot at lower pixel rates for less important shoots or when storage is at a premium.

If you shoot DNG+ lower resolution JPG files then the JPG files also have the lower resolution.

Digital Zoom (Crop Mode)

This works the same way as on the Q and Q2, and you need to use it in conjunction with the rear screen or the EVF.

Off 9504 x 6320 (60mp) 1.3x crop 7680 x 5104 (39mp) 1.8x crop 5248 x 3472 (18mp)

This can either be chosen through the menu or it can be allocated to one of the function buttons - You choose 1.3 crop or 1.8 crop and Live View frame lines are brought up separately for each crop. Whilst the EVF/LCD still shows the entire sensor.

If you are shooting with a 28mm lens that equates to approximately 36mm and 50mm, with a 35mm lens it will be approximately 45mm and 64mm etc. The EVF only shows the frame line for the chosen crop (1.3 or 1.8)

The DNG file shows as cropped in Lightroom: Using the crop tool will show the whole image with the crop lines. (Again, just as it does in the Q2)

If you have selected a Lower resolution DNG or JPG file and then you choose Digital Zoom the camera will revert to full sized DNG/JPG (quite right as well).

Apple MFI Compatibility and Leica FOTOS

MFI compatibility means that the M11 is the first Leica camera to be accredited by Apple to be compatible with iOS for both the iPhone and the iPad. this means that there will be much better GPS tagging using low power Bluetooth later on in the year.

The M11 already has the fastest WiFi file transfer to FOTOS of any of the Leica cameras, and this will be improved further later on in 2022. In the meantime FOTOS 3.0 has been released together with the M11, this allows connecting both by cable and by WiFi, and you can now filter selections by Favourites, and File Type, Downloaded / not downloaded.

Downloaded images can be transferred directly to Lightroom.

Remote control and 'Tethering' both work reasonably well with the M11, both with cable and with WiFi.

However, this is all rather a work in progress, and an expected firmware update and some FOTOS updates will improve things incrementally over the next year. Specifically , coming later in 2022 are:

• 5 GHz dual band IEEE802.11 Wifi
• Bluetooth connectivity (low power)
• GPS geottaging from your phone to the camera.

Cables and Compatibility

If you want to connect to your iPhone then the camera comes with a braided and branded Leica cable which is Apple MFi compatible. If you want to connect to an iPad or Android device then you will need a USB - C to USB - C cable or you can use the cable which comes with the charger. I've tried various cables and most seem to work okay (with the possible exception of Thunderbolt 3 USB-C cables). It's worth mentioning that lots of devices are fussy about USB-C cables (which are not all the same).

Connectivity via the USB-C cable to Lightroom and FOTOS will also be improved later in the year. You can select PTP or MFi for the USB mode in the camera settings. Later on if you select PTP you will be able to see the thumbnails for the DNG files (currently just a symbol).

PTP stands for Picture Transfer Protocol. This was developed by the International Imaging Industry Association to allow the transfer of images from digital cameras to computers and peripherals without the need for additional drivers. It shows the device within the application, but not in the Explorer/Finder screen.

MFi stands for Made for iPhone/iPad and is a licensing program for developers of hardware and software peripherals that work with iOS devices. Leica has passed the certification for this (it's displayed in the Camera Information / license information section of the menu.)

If you are planning to use the USB to connect directly to Lightroom or FOTOS on your computer then it's probably worth shooting DNG+JPG for the time being (until you can see the thumbnails in the DNG files).

Changed Menu System

The Menu system has been changed a lot to reflect the menus in the SL2 and Q2, this might not be to everyone's taste, but it has to make sense. I'm certainly grateful as it makes event shooting with the M11 and the SL2 much simpler.

Pressing the Menu button once brings up a touch screen quick menu just like that on the SL2 and Q2. Pressing it twice takes you to a favourites menu with items which can be switched off and on in the Customise Control / Edit Favourites. If nothing is chosen then the favourites menu is omitted and the second press of the menu button takes to to the menus themselves.

With the M10 I found the favourites very useful, but with the M11 the quick menu really has everything you are likely to need quickly, and the main menus are better organised than they are in the M10 (at least, this is pretty subjective stuff, but I like them better).

The Quick Menu screen replaces the old status screen which was raised by pressing the centre button of the 4 way controller on the M10 (this only acts as an OK button for menu selections)

The Lens Detection menu is much improved with an option to 'Edit list of M lenses' and also 'Edit List of R lenses'. When you choose this the list presents all the lenses just as it did with the M10, but you can switch lenses off and on. This means that if you just have a couple of uncoded lenses, when you choose Manual M you are presented with those lenses (with Edit List at the bottom). For example my list looks like:

• 35 f1.4 11869/11870/11860
• 90 f2.8 11807/11808
• 50 f1.4 11868/11856/11114
• Edit List of M lenses

As before it remembers the last used uncoded lens and uses that as the default.

Things worth talking about

Startup time and Power Settings

I've compared the startup / wakeup times to that of the M10 as best as I can. If you are using Live View, then the image comes up on the LCD / EVF on the M10 about 1/2 second more quickly than on the M11. On the other hand, with Live View switched off on both cameras, if you hold down the shutter and switch on the camera then the M11 takes an image about 1/2 second before the M10.

However, the greatly improved battery life on the M11 proves to be a real life saver here. Under Menu / Camera Settings / Power saver mode I have Camera Standby set to Off, and Display Standby set to 30 seconds.

This works very well, wake up is almost instant, and the battery doesn't drain fast if you aren't shooting, even with the EVF attached (unlike the M10 where the EVF seemed to drain the battery incredibly fast).

During the testing period (7 months) I've only had one battery, and (as long as I remembered to charge it) I've never managed to exhaust it during a day shooting - even with the EVF attached and power saving turned off.

Full time exposure metering and shutter lag

The shutter lag using the M10 with Live View was noticeable, and significantly longer than with Live View turned off (because of the need to close the shutter before opening it for the exposure).

The M11 is effectively in Live View all the time (even if the EVF/LCD are turned off). This means that the shutter must first close before opening it for the exposure (just like the M10 in Live View).

I wanted to find out whether the M11 suffered from shutter lag the same way as the M10 with Live view, but it's hard to measure shutter lag! In the end I devised an experiment which would measure the difference in shutter lag between the two cameras (rather than measuring the actual shutter lag which needs specialised equipment).

What I found was that the shutter lag on the M11 was effectively the same as that on the M10 with Live View switched off, and much less than the M10 with Live View switched on; which is good news.

Can Leica Lenses 'resolve 60mp'

I wonder how many times this question will be asked? I've resorted to help from the wonderful Roger Cicala at Lens Rentals for this (not because I couldn't say it myself, but because he says it so beautifully and so convincingly).

Roger's article "More Ultra High Resolution MTF Experiments" can be found here https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2019/10/more-ultra-high-resolution-mtf-experiments/.

But in this context the real point is his appendix "Why Megapixels are Stupid" which he has very kindly allowed me to print here:

I think this is beautifully put, simply speaking, using the M11 will improve your results from vintage glass as well as from the most modern APO lenses.

Tough (oh yes) (don't do this at home!)

When I test cameras that is just what I do, they don't get babied because that isn't the point. On the other hand, generally speaking I don't test them by dropping them from more than a meter (say 4ft) from the back of our van onto a tarmac road, it doesn't seem fair. More than this, I don't do it when my own personal 35 APO Summicron is attached!

Except that's exactly what I did; My backpack tipped over, the top opened and the camera dropped out . . it rolled off down the road, I don't think I need to explain the pain that this caused me. I can feel hundreds of readers cringing as they read this.

There is a small chip on the corner of the top plate and a scuff on the ISO dial (which still works perfectly). This was from where it actually hit the road, there are no marks on the paintwork from where it rolled (just a bright mark and a ding on the lens cap for the 35 APO). Of course I was lucky, but still it shows that the camera is tough, indeed, I feel that the removal of the base plate has probably made the camera more rigid and resilient.

This was a couple of months ago. Before that the camera had been on numerous dusty sweaty treks around Crete, and chilly wet ones in the UK.

For Christmas I was given a splendid modern waterproof jacket, and we went off to the Suffolk Coast to christen it on a particularly nasty winter morning. It wasn't raining much to start with, but after 2.1/2 hours when we got back to the van I found that the jacket had actually become pretty waterlogged, I simply hadn't realised how bad the weather was. The M11 had either been over my shoulder or in my hands (I took a lot of photos, it's an atmospheric place!). It had been switched on for the entire time.

When we got home I dried off the outside of the camera (which was very wet) I then checked in the battery/SD compartment and the lens mount and everything was completely dry. My coat weighed almost a kilo more than it did when we started!

Of course you shouldn't try this (and I didn't mean to), but I think this shows that the M11 is really tough - really really tough.

Shooting 60mp with a rangefinder

I've seen a lot of people saying that the antiquated rangefinder is not good enough to focus with such a high resolution sensor. If you're planning to focus on the third eyelash from the left in low light with your 0.95 Noctilux wide open then I might agree, but that's pretty tough with an EVF as well!.

I still find focusing with a rangefinder a thing of beauty and wonder, and extremely efficient, and I haven't changed my mind after thousands of shots with the M11; there are times when I like the EVF, but if I want to shoot quickly with the M11 then the rangefinder does a great job, just as it always has. Added to which it's such a pleasure focusing with a rangefinder!

Of course, if you are planning to print your 60mp shots 6ft by 4ft then you need to be a bit more careful with the focus, but that was always the case whatever the resolution of the sensor.

Pulling it all together

Superficially the M11 looks like an M10 with higher resolution, but actually it's quite a revolution in terms of image quality, connectivity and functionality. To sum up:

• The new base improves weather sealing and strength
• New black paint option is very resilient with grippy finish a
• Aluminium top plate on black version makes it 110 gms lighter
• Button layout is now the same as the SL2 and Q2
• 3 New programmable function buttons (Fn, top-plate, thumbwheel)
• New battery with 700 shot CIPA standard
• 64Gb of very fast internal memory
• Brand new and faster Maestro III processor
• New 60mp BSI sensor with excellent dynamic range
• Full time off-sensor metering (much more accurate, no extra shutter lag)
• Electronic Shutter (up to 1/16,000 sec)
• USB-C Charging,
• PTP and Apple MFI connectivity using USB-C port
• Improved FOTOS app allowing filtering selections and tethering
• New well constructed EVF with bigger and brighter image
• Combined Quick Menu and status screen
• Menus changed to be even more comparable with Q2 and SL2
• Improved menu system for uncoded M lenses
• Digital Zoom mode with frame lines for 1.3 and 1.8 crops
• Variable DNG size (18.4mb, 36.5mb and 60.3mb)

That's a big list of improvements!

Should I buy one?

Yes, I should (me, personally), more relevantly, should you buy one? I think that if you've got an M10-R, and you are happy with the image quality, resolution and operation, then the only really good reasons for upgrading are the internal memory, the electronic shutter, the better battery and the USB-C functions. If you are shooting with an earlier M10 or a previous digital Leica then the improvements to image quality and resolution are really very compelling.

Conclusion

Leica have worked hard during the 5 years since the launch of the M10 and they have managed to produce a camera that is improved in so many ways whilst still retaining the fundamental essence of the M camera (Messsucher). I'm sure that lots of people will be sad to see the demise of the baseplate, but you quickly get to like the idea that you no longer have to worry about it dropping on the floor!

The M11 is a camera which is suitable for any photographic assignment where autofocus is not required, but it's much more than that, the image quality is now up to medium format standards and the improved EVF allows for critical focusing where it's absolutely necessary. The electronic shutter gives extra scope for shooting fast lenses wide open in bright light. The internal memory gives the extra security that photographers usually get with dual SD card slots.

Although the M11 is not quite the smallest full frame camera with interchangeable lenses, it certainly is if you factor in the size of the lenses.

You might say that the M11 is the EVF based L mount camera that so many Leica aficionados have been asking for: They might complain that it's external, but it works so well, and you still have the advantage of having a proper rangefinder camera.

But for me the real purpose of any M camera is the ability to work with a rangefinder, and with the fantastic Leica lenses, both old and new. The M11 adds proper multi point metering without any speed sacrifice, improved image quality and less vignetting.

At first glance one might be tempted to think that the M11 is a small step up from the M10, but a longer look shows that it is improved in almost every respect. The changes may be evolutionary rather than revolutionary, but of course, that's what every existing M user really wants. On the other hand the improved EVF and the added connectivity is likely to please existing users and to attract new ones.

Acknowledgements

First of all to Emma, who has to put up with me spending hours testing, and telling her important things (which she is always polite about!). Also to Oscar, Scarlett and Roo for being such patient models.

Secondly to the guys at Leica; Stefan Daniel, Jesko von Oeynhausen and Viktor Weigant who have patiently answered questions and been generally great to work with.

Then to the other guys on the LUF Beta Forum (you know who you are). What a great bunch of people, it's been really fun working with you all and let’s hope we can meet up for that beer later on in the year!

Finally to all the denizens of the Leica User Forum who have informed this article by speculating on what the camera would be (and what it would not), and thus helping me to decide what to talk about.

Hi Jono,

Thanks again for always kindly answering questions.  I'm on an upgrade of my Leica ME and my Leica MD.  I work as a press photographer and have an employer paid set of Nikon D5 with all the lenses you could want.  And in March it will be replaced with the Canon R3.  Both systems are amazing.  The Canon R3 is a major upgrade.  But still, I would like to use my Leica M MUCH MUCH more.  But that does not happen because the Leca M (the models I have) does not work in a dark living room with in low light.  Top models of Nikon and Canon work great in low light.  That's why the Leica often stays in the car.  
I often work with 6400/12000 and a rare time 25000 iso.  If I submit a series of images, there may be some images of 200-1200 iso but also some 6400/12000/25000 iso.  

Questioner is about the colors.  It can be difficult to get the "colors to match" in such a series.  How does the Leica M11 work with it?  

I hope you understand the question - because in many reviews they do a test that shows how a camera makes pictures on different iso settings.  But the light in the "studio" they do the test is ofen "good light” and most cameras work well in this situation. 
But in practice it is not always that good. (same problem with Q2)
I hope Leica with this update wants more professional photographers to buy M again. ❤️
Then they have to do something about that problem.  Maybe it happened in Leica 11?  

Like in my young days where EVERYONE had an M6 with them.  I really wanted to try if this worked - but buying an M11 and finding out it does not work is just toooo expensive.

[Eclectic Man]

Re the different sized files (60Mp, 36Mp or 18Mp) they are mentioned in this short review of the M11 in Amateur Photographer:

https://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/reviews/compactsystemcameras/leica-m11-review?utm_campaign=811882_Amateur Photographer 14.01.22&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Kelsey Media Ltd&dm_i=5D8F,HEGA,3J0625,20MIG,1

 

[Advertisement]

Hallo,

Look here: Interesting Leica gear

[jonoslack]

6 hours ago, FrankX said:

Anyone knows if the black color on aluminum is the same quality/type used for the SL2? Quick answer appreciated!

Trying to sort whether to buy a black or a silver M11. Currently, I have a silver M10 - mostly bought since I thought it would be more robust. The silver looks quite mint after 5 years. However, I have also a SL2 for almost 2 years now without any scratches so far. 

I like the black M11 with the new black Visoflex 2 way more 😍, but the demo camera in the store seemed to have already a small "scratch"... (still black, but a little bit more shiny). 😮

Hi Frank

No it isn't - I've been beating this one up for 7 months, and apart from where I dropped it there are no scratches - just a very slight tendency to shinyness on the corners (nice). My SL2 is covered in bright spots, and my q2 mono looked in much worse condition much quicker.

If you've had an SL2 for 2 years and it doesn't have any scratches you're a more careful man than me!

all the best