Jump to content

M11 rumors : Leica in bed with Sony ?


nicci78

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On 12/30/2021 at 4:23 AM, Stevejack said:

For those worried about camera shake, here is a very quick and dirty example to show how easy it is to clean up even very blurry images. This is a panning shot taken at 1/30 second, with the rider going extremely fast. If I was ever going to use this image, I would spend some time actually finessing the result but what you see here is a one-click process.

The image on the left is straight out of camera, the image on the right has been run through Topaz sharpen on the motion blur setting. The forum will compress the hell out of the image but hopefully you can make out the difference. This is about as extreme as it will ever get for most people so any minor camera shake, if you do experience it, is truly a non-issue.

The key here is having enough pixels in your image for the sharpening software to work with. This file is from a 50mp camera, heavily cropped to show just the rider's head.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

What compression? You are allowed 2480 pixels wide….

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

While we are on the subject of camera motion artifacts in large MPx cameras (M10-R and GFX, for example), has anyone noticed that this year's Christmas lights are dominated by LEDs.  In outdoor displays these are usually powered by mains current, which gives them a flicker signal at 50-60 (or perhaps twice, 100-120) Hz.  I found this easily while walking around our Cambridge neighborhood after dark recently, shooting without great care at 1/8 sec. 

So how does Topaz handle this?  If it was really smart it would re-superimpose just the four or five images where the lights were brightest, ignoring the contributions from the positions in between.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, jaapv said:

What compression? You are allowed 2480 pixels wide….

The inline previews here are poor quality, although clicking on them shows the correct 2480 file as-uploaded. Not sure why the forum software has to be configured this way since it just adds an extra step for the user to have to click on every_single_photo to see them as intended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, jdlaing said:

And…..

In every section in the photos area there is a post called “How to post and view images” where it is explained.

3 hours ago, jdlaing said:

The extra click is not going to rob you of your valuable time.

LOL.

This is done on how many forums? And for what reason? Modern forums don't serve up lower-res compressed inline photos. Clicking on a photo should only be done if one wants to view it larger. 

Edited by hdmesa
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/27/2021 at 5:49 AM, rramesh said:

Well if Nikon and Sigma contemplate using it, why not Leica? After all, isn't it the micro lens, the cover glass design and software needed for Leica lenses that differentiates.

Why, down the road, Sony might just offer an A7M version body for M-mount lenses.

First time I hear micro-prism in combination with M11.

Are there micro-prisms now we have the tecnical details and the phase of speculation is over?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...