Jump to content

Is zm Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 shorter than 50mm planar?


surfmanjoe

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi, a lot of people complaints Distagon 35mm f1.4 is a bigger and heavier lens. B&H website says the lens dimension is  2.5 x 2.6" / 63.2 x 65.2 mm, I have 50mm planar at 2 x 2.7" / 52 x 68 mm, never thought it is big on M9. 

Understood the Distagon is heavier. but I am wondering is it shorter than Planar on M9? from the specification, it looks like yes. though only 3mm shorter.

Can anyone who have both answer? Thank you.

Edited by surfmanjoe
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, my 35mm lenses with hoods (subtract 3mm for the Distagon (protruding back lens), so it is 8,6cm) : :

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

50mm lenses (the Planar is 6,7cm) :

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...