Jump to content

Q2 + ?


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I bought a Q2 about a year ago, & I just love it!, it is such a joy to use. 

I have been a Nikon user for a number of years, & have a Z6, with a nice selection of lenses geared towards portraits & sports photography. My daughter is beginning to take photography more seriously & I’m thinking of gifting the Z6 to her.

So…. Whilst the Q2 is a thing of beauty I do need the ability to have interchangeable lenses, my question to the forum is whether the SL2-S (with the kit lens) would make a sensible compliment to the Q2?, otherwise I might just end up with a Nikon Z7ii, which is of course capable, but not a Leica!

All opinions welcome…..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sl2-S or SL2 has the advantage of: same menue system, same UI logic like Q2, same battery, comparable color.

Z7II - you know what you get from using the Z6, a major advantage is that the Nikon lenses are reasonable lower priced and still very good.

You get slightly better AF tahn SL2-s but you get a different UI aand differemt (IMO less intuitive) menue system, and colors out of Nikon are not allways up to Leica cameras out of hte camera (for my taste).

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Welcome and if you have the funds to kit yourself out with Leica lenses, the the SL2-S is a worthy camera ... but be aware, once you start on Leica lenses, the M lenses are very capable and make for a smaller package than the Z and with so many to choose from, you start getting addicted to the different looks from different lenses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have the 24-90 and for Xmas, got the 90-280. I would buy the SL 75 Summicron and the SL 50 Summilux but as I already have the M75 Summicron and Summilux and the M50 Apo, I find it hard to justify the native SL lenses. If starting new, I would look at the fixed focal length summicrons (f2) but the zooms are excellent. 

My favourite focal length is between 35 and 50 and is the 40mm where I use the Sigma M 40/1.2 but they have a SL version too. 

Edited by Sandokan
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sandokan said:

I have the 24-90 and for Xmas, got the 90-280. I would buy the SL 75 Summicron and the SL 50 Summilux but as I already have the M75 Summicron and Summilux and the M50 Apo, I find it hard to justify the native SL lenses. If starting new, I would look at the fixed focal length summicrons (f2) but the zooms are excellent. 

My favourite focal length is between 35 and 50 and is the 40mm where I use the Sigma M 40/1.2 but they have a SL version too. 

Do you mean the Voigtlander?  Sigma does not make lens in M mount.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...