Jon Warwick Posted August 11, 2021 Share #1 Posted August 11, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) Leaving aside possible protection of the front of the lens .....is there any benefit to the final image from using a UV filter with a digital camera? I am thinking here whether a UV filter is still of benefit to (say) reduce haze in places like the mountains? The reason I'm asking because I've read here and there that the the UV sensitivity of a digital sensor is so low (unlike for film) that it's simply superfluous these days to use a UV filter, or is that nonsense? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 11, 2021 Posted August 11, 2021 Hi Jon Warwick, Take a look here UV filters with digital camera?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Robert Blanko Posted August 11, 2021 Share #2 Posted August 11, 2021 IMHO, almost any consumer camera is equipped with a filter on top of the sensor for cutting off IR and UV spectrum parts. Thus, a UV filter on the lens would likely not add much in said respect. Moreover, conventional lenses and their coatings might block UV or signifikant Parts thereof as well. UV photography usually requires modification of the sensor glass, cf. for instance https://kolarivision.com/getting-started-uv-photography/ . 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted August 11, 2021 Share #3 Posted August 11, 2021 AFAIK the UV blocking is done by the lens, not by the IR filter on the sensor, at least not with Leica. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted August 11, 2021 Share #4 Posted August 11, 2021 45 minutes ago, Jon Warwick said: Leaving aside possible protection of the front of the lens .....is there any benefit to the final image from using a UV filter with a digital camera? I am thinking here whether a UV filter is still of benefit to (say) reduce haze in places like the mountains? The reason I'm asking because I've read here and there that the the UV sensitivity of a digital sensor is so low (unlike for film) that it's simply superfluous these days to use a UV filter, or is that nonsense? A UV filter is useful over 3000 meters to reduce haze. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted August 12, 2021 Share #5 Posted August 12, 2021 16 hours ago, jaapv said: A UV filter is useful over 3000 meters to reduce haze. Do you think so? If I remember correctly the 'Skylight' filter was a very slight pinkish colour and was intended to do this. I would have thought that a UV filter should now make no discernible difference to a modern UV blocking lens even at altitude although with very intense UV around it might add an extra block I suppose. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted August 12, 2021 Share #6 Posted August 12, 2021 That is precisely it. The filter gives a bit of additional UV blocking with very high levels of UV. The pinkish skylight can be simulated in post, but the dehaze slider does a better job. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now