Gobert Posted July 25, 2021 Share #41 Posted July 25, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) On 7/23/2021 at 4:27 AM, Mr.Q said: I've had both and the build quality feels the same. Optically they are identical as well. The 2 big differences are: 1) Version I allows the hood to be attached in reverse for transportation 2) Version I is less convenient when used with the newer macro adapter (might want to do some researching if you plan to use the macro adapter) I replaced the hood with a rubber one I found on Ebay. Much better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 25, 2021 Posted July 25, 2021 Hi Gobert, Take a look here Navigating the choppy waters of 90mm options. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
a.noctilux Posted July 25, 2021 Share #42 Posted July 25, 2021 (edited) Talking about hood on the Macro-Elmar-M 😄. The hood 12575 received with the lens is nice but I found a bit long/when mounted in operation ... for such small lens. I know I could reverse it. I've tried out the ITOOY/12580 ( cap not found ! ) or even 12585 that I had Never 100% satisfied with one of them. ... I forgot that ( 😏 just seen minutes ago ! ) ... I finally attached (for years now) not 'recommended hood' 12550 (like this one) ... taken from Elmar-M 50mm, screwed in the front of the lens then forgot about it, as part of the lens ( I took care not unscrewing when I pull the lens out ), I know now why I use this Macro-Elmar-M always uncollapsed. Cap 14038 snaps in just fine. Edited July 25, 2021 by a.noctilux Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.