andba Posted July 22, 2021 Share #1 Posted July 22, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) I recently picked up an M10-P and a 35mm Summilux FLE. Looking for a good 90mm to pair with the setup. Shooting a little of everything, mostly street. Very little in the way of traditional portraiture, very little landscape. Option 1a — For roughly $1500 you can get a modern Elmarit Option 1b — For roughly $1500 you can get a pre-ASPH Summicron Option 2 — For a third of that, you can get a Tele Elmarit Option 3 — For a little less than double you step up to the APO Summicron Is it worth it to bite the bullet and go all in on option 3? Is option 2 good enough for most situations? Is option 1 the best of both worlds — and within that, A, or B? Little help please! Thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 22, 2021 Posted July 22, 2021 Hi andba, Take a look here Navigating the choppy waters of 90mm options. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
a.noctilux Posted July 22, 2021 Share #2 Posted July 22, 2021 As usual, 👇 ...take one, use it then make decision 😉 Each has their own flaws/advantages/size/weight/flare prone/etc. I always have 'at hand' in 90mm Elmar, Elmarit, Tele-Elmarit, ... Jupiter 9 (2/85 ! ) for different use. I've had Summicron ( sold after some years of happy use, for different reasons ) and looking now for Summarit-M 2.5/90 (as the last Summarit-M line completing 35/50/75) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spydrxx Posted July 22, 2021 Share #3 Posted July 22, 2021 IMHO it really depends on what you plan to do with your images-large prints, web scans, etc. I've used a number of 90s and for my purposes settled on a much older Elmar 90/4. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoToad Posted July 22, 2021 Share #4 Posted July 22, 2021 vor 35 Minuten schrieb spydrxx: ... settled on a much older Elmar 90/4. Same with me. I bought a used Elmar 90/4 for the (for me) best compromise of image quality, size and weight and am happy with it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted July 22, 2021 Share #5 Posted July 22, 2021 The is the Summarit too ...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobert Posted July 22, 2021 Share #6 Posted July 22, 2021 I’m very pleased with a recent Macro-Elmar-M 4.0/90. The perfect combination of size and quality, unless you really need a faster lens of course. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted July 22, 2021 Share #7 Posted July 22, 2021 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) The T-E can give you unexpected flare when you don't want it in a street environment, but it's small, light and relatively inexpensive. The APO may be overkill for your intended use. Great lens, but big, heavy and expensive. And you'll likely stop it down in the street, if only to make sure you nail focus. The Summicron pre-ASPH is also big and heavy. And if you are going to stop it down, there's very little (if any) real-life difference with the APO. And it's cheaper. The Elmarit-M is the best all-rounder in my experience, although it isn't particularly small or light either. And unless the market has changed while I was sleeping. I think you are a bit on the high side in terms of price expectations for 1a (and 1b). That might change your perspective. Why didn't you consider the Summarit (either f/2.4 or f/2.5)? It should also pair nicely with your FLE in terms of rendering (I only have experience with the 75/2.5, but the 90 should be close). Edited July 22, 2021 by Ecar 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narsuitus Posted July 22, 2021 Share #8 Posted July 22, 2021 I purchased a Canadian made 90mm f/2 Summicron to use with my 35mm f/1.4. I use the pair for shooting street and documentary. The 90 does the job for me and cost less than $1000. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Brown Posted July 22, 2021 Share #9 Posted July 22, 2021 If you bought the 35 FLE then you definitely should get a used 75 lux (f/1.4), as it pairs perfectly with the 35. It is the setup I have, along with the 24 lux. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2021 Share #10 Posted July 22, 2021 I own the tele-elmarit thin and i would not swap it for any other leica m mount 90mm lens. For portraits it gives lovely results and although it can be prone to flair i have taken some beautiful back light images of my grand children with this lens. Its also very small just as leica lenses are supposed to be. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andba Posted July 22, 2021 Author Share #11 Posted July 22, 2021 Thanks everybody. It seems like the APO Summicron may be overkill for what I need. I'm not interested in the Summarit, as I've read that the build quality is lacking. I don't actually need anything super fast, so I'm between these two (with confirmed prices): _ Modern Elmarit $1300 _ Macro Elmar $2300 Is the tiny size and macro capability of the Elmar worth twice the Elmarit? From what it sounds like above, the Elmarit is an excellent lens. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.noctilux Posted July 22, 2021 Share #12 Posted July 22, 2021 (edited) If your hesitation and F/4 is fine, one of the lightest yet fabulous Leica M lens is the choice, Macro-Elmar-M 4/90mm I use one type 1, for different situations since 2007 and never have a complain in the results from f/4 to 22... Quite most of the time NOT collapsed, even if the collapsing doesn't hurt anything (nothing protruding at rear ! ). Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Forum discussion [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] Test Shots [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] Have fun Edited July 22, 2021 by a.noctilux 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Forum discussion [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] Test Shots [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] Have fun ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/322907-navigating-the-choppy-waters-of-90mm-options/?do=findComment&comment=4243218'>More sharing options...
Studienkamera Posted July 22, 2021 Share #13 Posted July 22, 2021 45 minutes ago, andba said: I don't actually need anything super fast, so I'm between these two (with confirmed prices): _ Modern Elmarit $1300 _ Macro Elmar $2300 Is the tiny size and macro capability of the Elmar worth twice the Elmarit? From what it sounds like above, the Elmarit is an excellent lens. That would be my short list as well. Some more considerations, which may or may not be important for you: The Elmarit-M 90mm shares the 46mm thread of your Summilux-M 35mm. Without accessories, the Macro-Elmar-M can achieve a minimum object size of 161x241mm (1:6.7), the Elmarit-M only achieves 220x330mm (1:9). This difference is relatively small given that one of these lenses bears the "Macro" designation. With the (very expensive) Macro-Adapter-M, the Macro-Elmar-M reaches 1:3. The Elmarit-M can reach 1:3 as well with the help of a (cheap) high-quality Olympus MCON-P02 achromat lens, which has a 46mm filter thread. However, you lose intermediate magnifications like 1:4. Among all my lenses, the Elmarit-M subjectively is the one with the highest mechanical quality. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andba Posted July 23, 2021 Author Share #14 Posted July 23, 2021 Thanks again everybody. We're getting close here! As for the Macro Elmar. Is version 2 light years better than version 1 in terms of ergonomics/locking it out? Is version 1 tolerable in that regard? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Q Posted July 23, 2021 Share #15 Posted July 23, 2021 1 hour ago, andba said: Thanks again everybody. We're getting close here! As for the Macro Elmar. Is version 2 light years better than version 1 in terms of ergonomics/locking it out? Is version 1 tolerable in that regard? I've had both and the build quality feels the same. Optically they are identical as well. The 2 big differences are: 1) Version I allows the hood to be attached in reverse for transportation 2) Version I is less convenient when used with the newer macro adapter (might want to do some researching if you plan to use the macro adapter) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harvard Kiwi Posted July 23, 2021 Share #16 Posted July 23, 2021 I purchased a 90mm Elmarit-M as I wanted the extra stop of light for low light street shots and because I found a decent priced used one, but the Macro Elmar is a beautiful lens. I played with a copy in a store and one day I think that will become my main 90mm. The sharpness is fantastic, and I have always enjoyed macro photography on other systems. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean-Michel Posted July 23, 2021 Share #17 Posted July 23, 2021 (edited) I have the ‘version 1’ but don’t have the ‘goggles’ and it is a very fine and useful lens, and it is very light and small. Should I ever want to do macro work, the new macro adapter will work with it. I am now also considering buying an SL2 or S to go with my M lenses and benefit from the IBIS. As it happens, my Leica dealer in Montréal, Canada, has a version 1 complete with the goggles for under $4000 Canadian. Just google Leica boutique Montreal or camtec photo Montreal and see their used or demo link. Jean-Michel Edited July 23, 2021 by Jean-Michel Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgcm Posted July 23, 2021 Share #18 Posted July 23, 2021 Andba, the best 90 is the one which best fits your rangefinder. All Leica 90 are very good or great if perfectly focused. A perfect match between camera and lens is by far more relevant than the type of lens. The perfect match is mainly a matter of luck and astrology. Try several different lenses and buy the one best matching your rangefinder. 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobert Posted July 23, 2021 Share #19 Posted July 23, 2021 21 hours ago, Narsuitus said: I purchased a Canadian made 90mm f/2 Summicron to use with my 35mm f/1.4. I use the pair for shooting street and documentary. The 90 does the job for me and cost less than $1000. I sold it. It is too big and heavy in my view. Almost a SLR lens. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted July 24, 2021 Share #20 Posted July 24, 2021 On 7/22/2021 at 4:30 PM, andba said: Thanks everybody. It seems like the APO Summicron may be overkill for what I need. I'm not interested in the Summarit, as I've read that the build quality is lacking. I don't actually need anything super fast, so I'm between these two (with confirmed prices): _ Modern Elmarit $1300 _ Macro Elmar $2300 Is the tiny size and macro capability of the Elmar worth twice the Elmarit? From what it sounds like above, the Elmarit is an excellent lens. You are correct. The 90 Elmarit is a superb lens. Small, light, razor sharp and a beautiful bokeh when used wide open with the subject close. If for some reason you get it and don't like it, you should be able to easily sell it and move to the macro elmar. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.