Jump to content

Image comparison 35 Summilux Asph with 35 Summicron APO Asph


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Someone asked about this in the review thread, but I thought it might be of more general interest.

Images shot on a tripod with focusing via EVF, Camera was M10-R.

In each group there is 35 summilux at f1.4, at f2 and then APO at f2 followed by a screenshot of 100% magnification of the focused area from Lightroom (f2 shots)

All shot DNG, with minimal exposure adjustment where necessary. 

FLE at f1.4

FLE at f2

APO at f2

Finally a 100% screenshot of the comparison both at f2

 

FLE at f1.4

FLE at f2

APO at f2

Finally a 100% screenshot of the comparison both at f2

 

FLE at f1.4

FLE at f2

APO at f2

Finally a 100% screenshot of the comparison both at f2

 

FLE at f1.4

FLE at f2

APO at f2

Finally a 100% screenshot of the comparison both at f2

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Someone asked about this in the review thread, but I thought it might be of more general interest. Images shot on a tripod with focusing via EVF, Camera was M10-R. In each group there is 35 summilux at f1.4, at f2 and then APO at f2 followed by a screenshot of 100% magnification of the focused area from Lightroom (f2 shots) All shot DNG, with minimal exposure adjustment where necessary.  FLE at f1.4 Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Ha

The APO seems lacking at f1.4. Jeff

I think no. The belgium coast is my secound home since about 40 years. Yust the old and lonly boy (my demented wife died one year ago) was sitting on the balcony together with a france red and an assortment of cheese, smoking a big Havanna, looking over the beach, the see and into the sky. The weather is changing rapidly as you may see below. The proof: A picture taken with my M 10-R plus Summicron 28 mm. Regards Hans, this time my S3 stays at home   Hello guest! Please reg

Posted Images

It would be great if you can shoot a chrome subject (like a chrome faucet or bumper) under moderate sunlight to see how APO shines?  Other person did a test on the 50APO VS 50LUX, the result was unexpected. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hans-Dieter Gülicher said:

Great. I`m looking for my ordered Apo 35 over more than 4 weeks. Back to Germany I will kill the Leica people of the Wetzlar Store.

Regards Hans

For which purpose?

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, jaeger said:

It would be great if you can shoot a chrome subject (like a chrome faucet or bumper) under moderate sunlight to see how APO shines?  Other person did a test on the 50APO VS 50LUX, the result was unexpected. 

You caught me at just the right moment (between one thunderstorm and the next!)

FLE at f1.4

FLE at f2

APO at f2

Finally a 100% screenshot of the comparison both at f2

 

You can see the increased CA on the FLE in the last shot

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Finally - I really ought to do some work!

FLE at f1.4

FLE at f2

APO at f2

Finally a couple of 100% screenshots of the comparison both at f2

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Gobert said:

It is a pity I am not allowed to travel yet, otherwise I would be pleased to assist you with the restoration of your toilet house.

Don't worry - I built it more than 30 years ago, so it'll probably last for a week or so until you can come and fix it.

😇😂

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Hans-Dieter Gülicher said:

I intend to use it with my M 10-R. Up to no Summicron 28 and 75 m, furthermore my old R 21-35 mm adapted. I like to pick up pictures of landscapes and nature.

Hans

I think you were being asked why you will kill the good people of Wetzlar😉

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Hans-Dieter Gülicher said:

I intend to use it with my M 10-R. Up to no Summicron 28 and 75 m, furthermore my old R 21-35 mm adapted. I like to pick up pictures of landscapes and nature.

Hans

Your name is not Jurgen von Belgium?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jonoslack said:

Someone asked about this in the review thread, but I thought it might be of more general interest.

Images shot on a tripod with focusing via EVF, Camera was M10-R.

In each group there is 35 summilux at f1.4, at f2 and then APO at f2 followed by a screenshot of 100% magnification of the focused area from Lightroom (f2 shots)

All shot DNG, with minimal exposure adjustment where necessary. 

....

Many thanks for this comparison.

FLE and APO performances are very close IMO, except on the roof, where the difference is quite visible...

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, tom0511 said:

thank you Jono. To my eye the Summilux FLE holds up quite good, even if the Summicron has the edge it doesn't make the Summilux look bad.

 

Hi Tom

it’s always been a great lens, and it still is! I think the differences are pretty much what you would expect.

all the best

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
vor 2 Stunden schrieb Gobert:

Your name is not Jurgen von Belgium?

I think no. The belgium coast is my secound home since about 40 years.

Yust the old and lonly boy (my demented wife died one year ago) was sitting on the balcony together with a france red and an assortment of cheese, smoking a big Havanna, looking over the beach, the see and into the sky. The weather is changing rapidly as you may see below. The proof: A picture taken with my M 10-R plus Summicron 28 mm.

Regards Hans, this time my S3 stays at home

 

Edited by Hans-Dieter Gülicher
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
vor 1 Stunde schrieb Gobert:

The North Sea coast weather can change quite rapidly. Impressive picture.

Yes Sir, thats the matter. Attached a further shot. Its the first time to catch it.

Have a nice day and groetjes uit De Haan

Dieter

Edited by Hans-Dieter Gülicher
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jonoslack
      Hi There
      Several people have asked me about this, and so it seemed to be worth doing it! 
      All the files were originally shot on DNG - the sharpening and noise reduction sliders in Lightroom were all zeroed. The SL2 files were opened in Photoshop and the Image size reduced without any noise reduction help. They were then exported as 100% jpg quality 12 jpg files. I've then done an XY comparison zoomed in to approximately 100% and taken a screen shot. I'll put this on to the Review thread as well, but I thought it was worth putting it up as a separate thread.
      As you would expect - downsizing the SL2 images does help with the noise - but even so, at higher ISO there is still at least a stop difference. In each case the SL2-S is on the left. To me this is a little like angels dancing on the heads of pins, and it's also open to methodology questions - and anyway, why would you not use noise reduction?) 
      First of all, the Scene:

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
      100 ISO: 

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! 400 ISO

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! 1600 ISO

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! 6,400 ISO

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! 12,500 ISO

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! 25,000 ISO

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! 50,000 ISO

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! Finally 100,000 on the SL2-S and 50,000 on the SL2

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
       
    • By onasj
      I obtained a customer-release—not pre-release/beta—M10-R and compared it side-by-side with the M10 Monochrom (hereafter referred to as the M10-M) on a test scene at high ISO values.  The firmware version for both was the latest firmware currently available to the public: 10.20.27.20 for the M10-R (upgraded from the initial released 10.20.23.49 firmware that was pre-installed in the new camera), and 2.12.8.0 for the M10-M. 
      Methodology: all shots were taken on a tripod with a 2-second delay to minimize vibration.  The same Leica 50 APO lens was used for all tests.  The aperture was set to f/5.6 for all tests, at which the resolving power of the 50 APO is about as high as possible among commercially available 35-mm format lenses.  The ISO value and shutter speeds were as follows:
      ISO 6400, 1/60 s
      ISO 12500, 1/125 s
      ISO 25000, 1/250 s
      ISO 50000, 1/500 s
      ISO 100000 (M10-M only), 1/1000 s
      To the best of my ability, the M10-R and the M10-M were treated equally.  The test shots were taken in one sitting, with the same tripod position 2.2 m from the target, and under the same lighting.  The images were focused by rangefinder and confirmed by live view for each camera.  The subject distance (2.2 m) was farther from the test scene than my earlier M10-R tests (1.3 m) because I anticipated that the M10-M might have no trouble resolving all the details of the scene from 1.3 m, even at absurdly high ISOs.
      To keep the test as pure as possible, all the test shots were taken as DNG files, then transferred and opened in Adobe Photoshop 2020 with Camera Raw 12.3 (which has native M10-R support) with no corrections or adjustments to the default image settings, other than clicking “B&W” to convert the M10-R images to monochrome.  Therefore, this test does not really answer the question of how the performance between the cameras compares if one were to bring the full power of modern post-processing, noise removal, AI-driven scaling and sharpening, etc. to bear on the images.  It also does not exploit the important ability of adjusting the levels of different colors when converting color files to monochrome files—arguably the largest advantage of using the M10-R to generate monochrome photos instead of the M10-M.  Instead, the purpose of this test is to compare the acuity and noise level of the two cameras at ISO 6400 to ISO 50000.
      Overall, both cameras take remarkably good monochrome photos, even at ISO levels such as 12500 that would previously be considered out-of-reach.  Here are 100% crops from a small portion of the center region of both cameras (M10-R on the left, M10-M on the right).  Click on the image below to view it at 100% to avoid scaling artifacts.  I would have no hesitation using ISO 12500 monochrome images from either camera for virtually any application.  But of course there are substantial performance differences.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! Finding #1: The M10-M captures higher acuity levels than the M10-R across the ISO range tested (6400 to 50000).
      As expected, given the lack of a Bayer color filter array (CFA) and no need to de-mosaic the red-, green-, or blue-filtered pixels, the M10-M offers significantly higher acuity than the M10-R.  To my eye, the advantage persists even if you give the M10-R an advantage of one or two stops: compare the sharpness of the fine features of the scene as captured by the M10-M at ISO 25000 vs. the M10-R at ISO 6400, or the M10-R at ISO 25000 to the M10-M at ISO 100000—a remarkable testament to the M10-M’s ability to capture a scene down to the smallest details, even zooming in to 100%.  Notice also that at the same ISO level, aperture, and shutter speed (chosen by each camera’s auto-shutter speed setting to be the same at all ISO levels!), the M10-M images are only modestly brighter than the M10-R; I was surprised that the Bayer CFA didn’t dim the M10-R images more strongly.  Perhaps the M10-R firmware partially compensates for the loss of light due to the Bayer CFA.
      Finding #2: The M10-M offers about a 1- to 2-stop advantage in high-ISO noise levels over the M10-R.
      Compare the M10-M at ISO 50000 to the M10-R at ISO 12500, or the M10-M at ISO 25000 to the M10-R at ISO 6400. The M10-M continues to blow me away with its high-ISO performance.  Indeed, Bill Claff’s measurements at https://photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm rank the M10-M’s high ISO performance as fourth among all cameras tested to date, behind the Phase One IQ4, the Phase One IQ3, and the Fuji GFX-100—three current or recent top-of-the-line medium format cameras.
      Overall, Leica has created in the M10-M and the M10-R two current-generation sister cameras with outstanding overall performance.  If acuity or high-ISO performance is more important than color for your particular application, than the M10-M outperforms the M10-R and is among the very best cameras to my knowledge, even joining some medium-format monsters.  And if color is needed, either in the final image or to enable creative conversion to black and white images that allows easy sky darkening, face lightening, etc. during post-processing, the M10-R remains an option worthy of its current flagship status among Leica M cameras.
    • By Stick
      What is the benefit to shooting JPEG and RAW?
      I am starting to get overwhelmed by having doubles of all pictures, not to mention the additional space requirement.
       
      Does anyone shoot only JPEG? Why?
      Does anyone shoot only RAW? Why?
      Thanks!
    • By Herr Barnack
      Here's a marginally interesting read about the Noctilux.  I can't agree with much of what he has to say about the Noctilux being hard to work with, but he did hit one nail on the head when he observes that "...the best things in life are rarely rational."
      Noctilux lenses are maligned by some, as is the bokeh they produce.  I suspect it is not out of a distaste for bokeh or a misunderstanding of how to effectively use it as a composition tool.  I suspect that it is based on a hatred of the Noctilux lenses based on the price, as is the case for some who hate all M cameras and lenses because of their price tags, which is an utterly childish and self-centered outlook IMHO. 
      The author is using the 0.95 Noctilux, which may be harder to work ith than the older f/1.0 Noctilux, which I have.  I'm wondering if those who have used both the 0.95 and the 1.0 if the newer f/0.95 version is harder to work with than its older sibling? 
      A link to the article:
      https://www.35mmc.com/18/08/2019/bokeh-worship-the-leica-noctilux-m-50mm-f-0-95-asph-by-steven-bleistein/
      Thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...