Jump to content

Jono's Review: Leica Vario Elmarit SL 24-70 f2.8 ASPH


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, Jeff S said:

I meant compared to the Sigma.

I don’t own the SL 16-35, but I think it also doesn’t telescope when zooming.  

Jeff

I have the 16-35 and it is internal focusing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Here it is, Leica have just announced the new Vario Elmarit SL 24-70 f2.8 ASPH for L mount cameras. It's smaller and 300gm lighter than the 24-90, has a constant f2.8 aperture and is only a little bit more than half the price of it's bigger sibling. Even cheaper if you buy it as a kit with the SL2 or SL2S. Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! Hello guest! Please register

Hi guys, sorry to hijack Jono's thread but since I do have both the Sigma and Leica lenses with me right now I might share some insights after shooting with both side by side in my living room: The Sigma is a tad sharper wide open in the center, the Leica is sharper in the corners...again only a tad and differences are only visible when zooming in (like 200%). The more you close down the aperture the sharper the Leica gets overall.  On my SL2-S the Leica seem to be metered a bi

Hi,    yes, I agree that 2.8 is beside other topics, also a marketing topic. That lesser and lesser optics are parfocal is something which also stills-photographer do not like, but it's not such a big deal for them.    With all the whining about this only being a re-badged and therefore too expensive solution, it's in the end all about choices (so for me positive). First, there is now a Leica "entry-zoom" people can buy in the the kit or as an extra to have one affordabl

Posted Images

@jonoslack

Interesting, I compared the MTF graph and the lens elements to the Leica R 35-70 f/2.8 zoom lens that become such a cult lens.  The MTF is similar and not terribly different.  The lens design is, but I wonder if that zoom had any bearing on how this one was created?

I still enjoy the Leica R 28-90 ASPH on the Leica SL2, not weather sealed, but easy to hold.

D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 hours ago, jonoslack said:

Hi Mike

I think variable aperture is still an issue for videographers - but I quite agree with you in terms of stills photography - a pre-digital problem (if it was ever one) (and isn't floating ISO brilliant). 

But I don't think this is a strange choice - first of all it is pandering to those who still really do want constant aperture zooms, but on a larger scale it's testing the water - there really is a need for lots more lenses (telephotos and ultra-wides particularly) for the L system - Sigma and Panasonic are addressing it, but Leica would be hard put to cover all the bases quickly, so why not make some in Japan?

All the best

I agree with Jonathan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waiting for comparison between the Sigma and Leica versions.  The similarity makes the rebranding suggestion hard to deny.  Higher quality control and calibration could certainly justify Leica premium, as long as we are are not paying double for different engraving.

Link to post
Share on other sites
vor 8 Stunden schrieb davidmknoble:

@jonoslack

Interesting, I compared the MTF graph and the lens elements to the Leica R 35-70 f/2.8 zoom lens that become such a cult lens.  The MTF is similar and not terribly different.  The lens design is, but I wonder if that zoom had any bearing on how this one was created?

I still enjoy the Leica R 28-90 ASPH on the Leica SL2, not weather sealed, but easy to hold.

D.

+1  

The R 28-90 ASPH is a great lens, convenient to use, length does not change much, minimum @50 mm, gets longer both towards 90 mm and 28 mm.

- Matti

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Apoqualia said:

Very strange lens. The optical characteristics of the output look .. strange.
The lens is definitely NOT an optical design done by Leica, and definitely not by some top tier Japanese optical designer. 
 

Can you elaborate, please... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Jeff S said:

The cheaper plastic one is already $200.  😳  Mine generally stays home or in the bag, except in the rain. 

Jeff

The opposite for me.. The hood lets me put the camera face down.. I never used it without the hood.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, uranage said:

You mentioned that the 24-70mm hood fits the 24-90mm, but what about other way around?

I think it should.. Leica hoods across S and SL are also compatible with each other if the thread size is same.. so, I am sure it’s standard 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, jonoslack said:

For Video you certainly don't want the exposure to change when you zoom in or out. So this lens will be a welcome addition for video photographers who would have had to limit themselves to an aperture of F4 or smaller when shooting with the 24-90.

Well written, competent and thought-out review. You certainly know how to take excellent photographs (which most reviewers on YouTube don't). Great work, thanks!

But I disagree with your quote above. Cinema zooms in the past, and even today do ramp, some visibly, some only a tad, meaning that pictures get darker when zooming to the lens' long end. Cinematographers know their trade and compensate for that accordingly by closing the aperture. But one thing you cannot compensate for: keeping the focus while zooming.

A cinema zoom that isn't parfocal and doesn't keep the focus throughout the range (every lens has some dents in the focus curve at specific focal lengths. That's why you put them on a projector to know them) isn't considered to be a proper cinema zoom. The 24-90 I happen to own, and I use for filmmaking, isn't parfocal, and I don't expect the 24-70 to be either. This means that zooming in and out while filming doesn't work correctly with regular stills lenses, and we just don't do it. Thus, a fixed f stop isn't required for video.

In the end, the fixed aperture is a marketing tool. The market's fixation on a fixed aperture with "pro" zooms makes the wide end unnecessary slow and the long end ramp a bit. It's somewhat telling that Leica is going down that route with their new 24-70. But anyone who wants the best "standard" zoom on the market for the L-mount can purchase the 24-90. But I'm sure its sales will go down rapidly. 

Interesting developments, and with the advent of the SL2-S somewhat inevitable.

Edited by hansvons
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...