Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The list of automatically detectable Leica-M lenses was extended including the 50/1.2 (11820) but not the new 50/1.2 asph (11686, 11702) apparently.

Edited by lct
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, johntobias said:

does it get the perspective control feature of the new M10 firmware ????

 

 

8 minutes ago, lct said:

The M240 2.1.0 firmware works just fine, but does not include perspective control.

It's difficult to see what the differences are apart from, as LCT says, the addition of a new lens or two in the coding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve had one issue using the multifunction grip. The gps seems quirky after the firmware update. I’ve had to switch on and off a couple times to get it to register and never had that problem before.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Am 31.1.2021 um 21:51 schrieb jdlaing:

I’ve had one issue using the multifunction grip. The gps seems quirky after the firmware update. I’ve had to switch on and off a couple times to get it to register and never had that problem before.

I also use GPS sometimes. What happened exactly? Does the failures are repeatable or could it also be just some unfortunate circumstances (e.g. blocked satellites through buildings or trees...)?

Would be great to know, what was changed in this firmware. In the last updates they do nothing about the GPS feature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Do you have a source with informations about it? I couldn't find any information at all. On the Leica page there was only the download-link.

If they only add profiles then there should be no issue with the GPS (or at least not more issues as there was beforeM;-).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Johnwy
      When I use a one-thousandth shutter, these nasty black line marks will appear in the same position in picture. Is the problem of high-speed shutter ? Can it be solved by adjusting the shutter curtain tension?
      The film has been checked, it is not a problem with processing and scanning.
       

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
    • By Al Brown
      What are your cravings, needs, wishes and desires regarding M lenses that do not exist yet?
      21mm Summicron? Perhaps a 24mm Summicron? A brand new and Karbe - updated 75mm f1.4 Summilux? A new line of affordable budget M lenses? Some vintage revivals?
      Share your thoughts - within reason of course.
    • By Al Brown
      We already have a very extensive 'Mandler Magic' topic, but as much I am keen on Mandler's signature look and his contribution to the "Leica glow", there is another very distinguished gentleman in the 'House of Leica' that as a leader of Leica's optical design team since 2002 gave us a bunch of new high performance M-Lenses and pushed the terms FLE, ASPH and APO towards modern Leica perfection. He was the guy that had the balls to say Dr. Mandler's 75mm Summilux 1.4 was his *least* favorite design and went on to "Make Summilux great again" - all the way down to 21mm.
      Show us some of the "clinical look" of the Peter Karbe magic and do tell what lens he designed is your favorite...

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By chris_tribble
      I'm currently wrestling with which lenses to keep / sell  / add - and wonder if others are dealing with similar issues.
      At the moment I'm using two systems.  L mount and M mount. 
      The L mount system is one SL2 body and the following lenses:
      VE 24-90
      VE 90-280
      Sigma 45 f2.8 DG DN
      The M system is two M10 bodies and:
      15 Voigtlander Super-wide Heliar III f4.5
      28 Summicron Asph
      35 Summicron Asph
      50 Summilux Asph
      50 Summarit f2.4
      75 Summarit f2.4
      90 Macro-Elmar + macro adapter
      135 M Apo-Telyt f3.4

      In the current circumstances, my daily carry everywhere is the SL2 + 24-90.  I never thought it would be so easy to manage - but it is.  Because of how life is at the moment, I'm hardly using the VE 90-280.  This means there is a large lump of money sitting in a lens that is little used.  However, I got it for a good price used and I'll hold on to it for a year or two and then review.  I don't use the Sigma 45 so much since I got the VE 24-90 (which is SUCH a good, well behaved lense), but I still like the images I make and I am happy to retain it for now.  I'm also not using the M's much at present. This isn't a reason for getting rid of them - but the retained lenses are another issue.  If I look back through thousands of images in my Lightroom archive, the three M lenses that dominate are 28 / 35 / 50.  The others account for only about 5% of images.  I loved the 90 Macro when I first got it - but I was mainly using it as a compact medium telephoto on the M10, and not really using it for macro!  AND The Sigma 45 (with its near macro capability)  on the SL2 was so much easier to work with!  Likewise, I've had the 135 A-T for a long time, and it's a flawless lens (which works great on the SL2), but how much do I use it? Very little at the moment.  I use the Voigtlander 15 Super-wide Heliar very little too - but I know that it's essential for certain kinds of interior and landscape
      Now that I have the SL2, the lenses that are really redundant are the 50 & 75 Summarits + the 90 Macro-Elmar.  Off to Ffordes they will go.  But then what.  What am I lacking.  My current feeling is that it's a really good portrait lens and (possibly) a dedicated medium telephoto / macro lens.  Which leads me to Sigma.  It seems that the new 85 1.4 DG DN is a candidate as is the 105 Macro DG DN.  I'm also tempted by the 35 f2 DG DN - though this overlaps with the 35 Summicron (which works beautifully on either M or SL).
      SO - does anyone have experience with the two Sigma lenses mentioned above (85 / 105).  Does anyone have other thoughts?  I'm toying with the Sigma 14-35, but I'm not sure if I'd use it that much.  Heigh ho - I suppose this is all to do with too much time on my hands during the pandemic - though I did get out this morning in beautiful sunshine and snow (with the SL2 and 24-90!). Examples here: 
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!  
       
      Thanks for any thoughts...
    • By Sarahpe
      Hallo, nach einem kleinen Sturz auf Glatteis mit dem Kamerarucksack bewegt sich beim Fokussieren der eingespiegelte rahmen nicht mehr und lässt sich somit auch nicht mehr übereinanderlegen. Im Liveview funktioniert alles normal. Bei genauem hinsehen kann man durch das Fenster des Entfernungsmessers? sehen, dass etwas gebrochen ist (von außen jedoch keine Beschädigung). Was kann das sein? Ist das reparabel und wirtschaftlich sinnvoll? 

      Bin Dankbar für jede Hilfe!

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
×
×
  • Create New...