double00 Posted December 4, 2020 Share #1 Posted December 4, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hello All - new to the forum and Leica - some great / useful information here. I am coming from Nikon, Fuji and Sony. I recently purchased a Leica CL and along with an 18-56 lens. The build quality, size, UI and results are excellent. I really like this camera and would like to purchase an additional lens. I can't decide on the 11-23 or the 55-135. What would you consider to be the better combination? Is one of those lenses considered better than the other? Without IBIS, would the wider lens be the better choice? I have not been able to handle either one. Any information / shared experience is appreciated. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 4, 2020 Posted December 4, 2020 Hi double00, Take a look here Lens Question. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
wda Posted December 4, 2020 Share #2 Posted December 4, 2020 Welcome. My choice was the tele-zoom, but it depends on your choice and treatment of subjects. Consider also a fast prime, such as 23 mm Summicron. That can be very useful in challenging light situations. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 4, 2020 Share #3 Posted December 4, 2020 I decided for the 55-135 but I am more of a long focal length photographer. Both lenses are equally excellent so you will have to decide by the intended use. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommonego@gmail.com Posted December 4, 2020 Share #4 Posted December 4, 2020 As it has been said what do you prefer? I tend to like good wide zooms, and prime long focal length lenses. This can change too, it is all what do YOU want. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
double00 Posted December 4, 2020 Author Share #5 Posted December 4, 2020 Thanks for your replies - I will probably at some point, purchase both lenses. I was just curious if one was better than the other. I understand it is my choice based on how I intend to use the lens. I use cameras / lenses mostly for travel. That's why the interest in the CL. From what I have read, it seems both of those lenses are fairly equal just made for different purposes. I have ordered the 11-23 and should have it next week. I still have the Fuji X100V and for now, will use that if I have the need for a little faster glass. Appreciate your suggestions. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 4, 2020 Share #6 Posted December 4, 2020 Sounds like a good choice. You can also look at M-mount lenses on the adapter for primes. If you want to keep the costs down, Voigtländer and Zeiss make some wonderful lenses at quite reasonable prices, not to mention the various recent Chinese options. A point about the relative "quality" of lenses. Here on the forum we will argue endlessly about the finer points of rendering, aberrations, resolution, contrast, and so on. In the end this is completely irrelevant. The best lens is the one that takes the image you want to take, be it an Apo-Summicron or a pinhole lens. This is the Leica world you entered into. The photographic result transcends the technicalities and simplicity trumps gimmicks. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdHox Posted December 5, 2020 Share #7 Posted December 5, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) At home I'm a tele guy, so I use the 55-135 more than the 11-23. On holidays I tend to use wider lenses, so on my next trip - in 2021?🤞- my 11-23 is more likely to grab the second spot zoom in my bag. Eventually you'll want 11-23, 18-56, & 55-135; the question os just the order in which you buy them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
double00 Posted December 5, 2020 Author Share #8 Posted December 5, 2020 On 12/4/2020 at 12:34 PM, jaapv said: Sounds like a good choice. You can also look at M-mount lenses on the adapter for primes. If you want to keep the costs down, Voigtländer and Zeiss make some wonderful lenses at quite reasonable prices, not to mention the various recent Chinese options. A point about the relative "quality" of lenses. Here on the forum we will argue endlessly about the finer points of rendering, aberrations, resolution, contrast, and so on. In the end this is completely irrelevant. The best lens is the one that takes the image you want to take, be it an Apo-Summicron or a pinhole lens. This is the Leica world you entered into. The photographic result transcends the technicalities and simplicity trumps gimmicks. I have heard good things about Voigtländer and Zeiss lenses - What adapter for the CL would you recommend for these lenses? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
double00 Posted December 5, 2020 Author Share #9 Posted December 5, 2020 5 hours ago, AdHox said: At home I'm a tele guy, so I use the 55-135 more than the 11-23. On holidays I tend to use wider lenses, so on my next trip - in 2021?🤞- my 11-23 is more likely to grab the second spot zoom in my bag. Eventually you'll want 11-23, 18-56, & 55-135; the question os just the order in which you buy them. Agree on the 11-23 for holidays - that's why I ordered the 11-23 first. We hope to begin traveling again late next year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 5, 2020 Share #10 Posted December 5, 2020 49 minutes ago, double00 said: I have heard good things about Voigtländer and Zeiss lenses - What adapter for the CL would you recommend for these lenses? Only the (expensive) Leica adapter. That will give full functionality, no third-party one will, although they will work in a limited fashion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.