Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

OK. I am starting from that point where we all start: total ignorance.  I receive my M8.2 today when FedEx delivers the little honey.  I would not normally run an eBay camera by a repair facility to check it but this is special.  And the seller has a 30 return window so I want a skilled tech to 1) look it over and evaluate its condition and, 2) do a CLA if needed.  I will bring it up with the new lens so that the tech can check how well the lens gets along with the rangefinder.

I have read on this board and in this sub-forum that two esteemed Leica techs will not open an M8/M8.2 because of "grounding issues."  I have asked Wetzlar and finally Leica NJ about this.  They have danced all around this and are as good at equivocation as any politician or time-share salesman.  The best I could get out of them was that taking the camera to a non-Leica facility may void my warranty.  They have not said that any other tech is unable to inspect, evaluate or repair the M8/M8.2.

So I am going to be a guinea pig on this.  I will take some pics when the camera arrives, of course, just to make sure it works.  Tomorrow I will drive up to PDX and drop it off with a repair facility I have had do work in the past.  They did the job right in the past on a Pentax digital.  I will see what happens.  I will know it worked before I brought it up.  I will have the digital proof.  I will also see what these fellows can do.  And the tech left me a message to the effect that the M9 was pretty much an M8/M8.2 inside but with a bigger sensor.  So we know he has opened up a few of them.

As they used to say on TV, "Tape at Eleven."

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would buy from a reputable dealer that checks gear first and offers its own warranty and return policy (and sometimes even Leica warranty if it has been recently serviced).  No need for service if no problems are apparent after appropriate shooting tests. When problems do occur, outside warranty/return, I first call DAG (Don Goldberg) to discuss.   

Jeff

Edited by Jeff S
Link to post
Share on other sites

The camera went through the tests at my guy in PDX.  When I came back after about 3/4 of an hour the tech, Dave, asked if I wanted the good news or the bad news.  I opted for both.  The good news, "You got yourself a good camera."  It passed all his tests.  He did find a few spots on the sensor which he cleaned.  The bad news?  Trash the SD card.  

And here are his words of wisdom on SD cards in the M8/M8.2:  Use the recommended 32GB size.  That is what the camera is designed to work with.  That it has not yet failed with a 64GB card does not guarantee that it will not.  You only have to be wrong once. And do you really want around 4,000 images all in one place?  Right.  Expose yourself to as little risk as possible.  Dave even recommended 16GB cards over the 32GB cards.  Why?  If one chokes while you are on vacation or whatever you still have at least one good card and you may have lost a lot of images but not a huge amount.  And the world famous PhotoRec (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec) can usually recover a lot of what you may think is gone forever.  Let's hear it for our French friend who wrote this software.

Grounding Issues

OK, we all knew the answer to this one.  Can you sat MOSFET?  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec)  We all know from our computers that MOSFET's just do not like static electricity.  And if you and the MOSFET board are not grounded and you pick up some static electricity you may have also just picked up the price of some MOSFET cards.  We always ground ourselves when we change boards or hard drives in our computers.  Digital cameras are just computers with a lens hung on them, and their electronic insides are MOSFET's.

Kids, this ain't rocket surgery.  We just overlooked the obvious.  That's just part of life.

An extra: one tech at the shop, Advance Camera of Portland, Oregon, bought an M9 with a bad sensor and then one as a parts donor.  He put the sensor from the donor camera into the camera with the bad sensor and just loves his new M9.  As for Dave, the tech I dealt with, and the store, I can tell you that they have done right by me this time and in the past when I brought in a shaky Pentax digital.  He could have charged me for a CLA but told me it did not need one. There is nothing quite as heartening as dealing with an honest broker. Again, Advance Camera of Portland, Oregon.  Good guys who know how to do it.

 

Cheers to you all.

Edited by boojum
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Irvin
      Hello Friends, 
      I recently noticed that my M4 has a slight delay while I am focusing from infinity to 0.8. The patch would not align, it's quick but i can tell there like a millisecond lag. I found out that the rangefinder roller is a little stiff when a push it back. Is this something i can fix myself or do i need an expert to CLA my camera? I bought it 6 months ago.  No idea when it was last CLA'd but it is in excellent condition. 
      Thank you in advanced!!! 
    • By Keops
      Hi there. Today while taking photos with my MP I realized some kind of liquid had dropped on the back of my camera. It had been dried before I noticed it. As a reflex I immediately clean the thing but the same stuff had also snuck on to the light seal cloth that covers the parameters of the back door. How can I clean the residue on the light seal? Or should I bother? I am afraid of the possibility of the strange liquid damaging the light seal.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By JackCrofts
      Hi all,
      I am still quite new to repairing cameras and lenses but so far I have a pretty good track record for fixing them. I have mainly repaired Canon rangefinders and some Canon SLRs. I recently picked up a R4 which has the problem of a possible jammed shutter. Basically the shutter does not fire when the shutter button is depressed. I have checked both magnets under the battery compartment and could not see any dirt that was causing a weak connection. I have also compared the cams and gears to a Minolta XD11/7 as I have read on this forum that they have the same internals. I have only worked with cloth shutters in SLRs and not the later bladed shutter curtains.
      To me this looks like it might be jammed but I am not 100% sure as an image of the shutter in the Minolta service manual looks similar, unfortunately this detail in the scanned document is to contrasty to tell. 
      I am also wondering if there is a way to trip the shutter without using the shutter button? 
      If you could help me out I would be very grateful!
       
      Many Thanks,
       
      Jack

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By framecontrol
      So I was ripping around in an off-road vehicle in Sedona and taking some beautiful landscape photos with my Q2. All of that off-roading caused the Q2 to get covered in some fine dust and sand and while the camera worked fine, you could feel the dust inside the aperture ring and dial—it was just a little grindy and you could tell it needed to be cleaned, but otherwise it was perfect.
      The camera got shipped off to Leica in New Jersey and 2 weeks later they came back with a repair starting point of $2,600! Apparently, they didn't open up the camera or anything and just do a general look at things and an assumption prior to the true estimate. My shop told me they wrote very basic notes - "Damages by sand - Need to adjust auto focus, replace parts, check, adjust, clean" - it seemed very templated. They did not say what parts needed to be replaced (according to my shop.) They did say shipping was included.
      Just wanted to see if anyone has any suggestions. Maybe the actual repair will cost less? Should I push back on them? Do I have other options outside of Leica?
      Thank you!
    • By twcxz
      Hi everyone, 
      I'm currently working on a project to once and for all fix the analogue Leica CL's broken take up spool problem, by 3D printing them. 
      I've ran a roll through mine with version 2 of the spool and it works pretty good, but i'm working on version 3 which should be better still - I got the dimensions slightly wrong on this one - it's too short.
      How many of you CL owners would be interested in buying such an item? They'd cost around £20 and be sold through eBay all said and done, and I'd make a video showing how to take apart the CL and install them, as well as reassembly - International shipping would happen too through the eBay GSP as I'm UK based.
      The attached photo is version 2 and not by any means the final version as this is still in very early development, but the quality of the ones that go on sale will be much higher. This one was printed by a friend of mine, but I'm soon going to acquire my own printer and make them much better.
      I know also that this doesn't look anything like the original, but when I copied the original part dimension for dimension, curve by curve, it didn't work and suffered the same problems as the original.. immediately. Thus I simplified it and made it more "3D Printer friendly."
      Thanks
      Tom
       
       
       
       

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
×
×
  • Create New...